This is a normal and healthy reaction to evil. Suppressing such reactions is part of how our society has degraded to the state we're in. You can't simply write off every organic surge in a desire for meaningful consequences as a result of malicious agitators. At some point suppressing the expression of that desire for meaningful punishments for wrongdoing crosses the threshold into active endorsement of the wrongdoing. I don't know if we're there yet Dom, but your insistence on enforcing all of the reddit baggage on this site makes me think we're rather close to that threshold as a baseline.
It is absolutely not a healthy reaction to draw and quarter anyone. Even if we were to argue about a sense of justice and closure, that doesn't come from mutilation and torture. Just recently a criminal was given death by firing squad in Florida, and the police did not drink his blood, dismember his corpse, or bludgeon a family member with the body parts of the criminal. This is because we are not insane savages. His execution was the ending of his life and the recognition that he can no longer harm another person, and no amount of Leftist True Crime documentaries from the Innocence project will get him out.
Rejecting wrongdoing for the sake of punishing wrongdoing is the opposite of endorsing wrongdoing.
A healthy reaction would not to be rage baited, and to move on and make positive and affirmative steps to make the world a better place around you with a sense of love, discipline, and justice in your heart. None of that involves chopping people into pieces.
It is absolutely not a healthy reaction to draw and quarter anyone.
Is it any different from hanging someone by the neck until dead? That's no less torturous, but I'd wager it wouldn't have provoked the same reaction had I advocated that sentence instead. You're being dishonest with yourself.
The point of such sentences is to provide a very public display of punishment that serves to scare the everloving shit out of the rest of the criminally inclined population(read: low IQ, violent and impulsive niggers). They don't understand abstract ideas such as prison but a physical punishment is simple enough that they might be able to understand the implications and not want to end up like their fellow ilk.
A healthy reaction would not to be rage baited, and to move on and make positive and affirmative steps to make the world a better place around you with a sense of love, discipline, and justice in your heart.
Justice requires meting out harsh consequences for vile behavior. No amount of Love and Peace is going to deter the wicked. Failing to dole out said consequences because you want to sit in a circle and sing kumbaya is just cowardice and abandoning responsibility.
Understand the kind of scum you're dealing with and select an appropriate punishment. Not everyone is going to be corrected by a stern lecture and a timeout. Some individuals are human animals and need to be addressed as such. Until we have a homogenous population again, we can't employ your soft weak hippy shit system because it will do nothing to deter niggers from behaving like niggers.
But why?
This is a normal and healthy reaction to evil. Suppressing such reactions is part of how our society has degraded to the state we're in. You can't simply write off every organic surge in a desire for meaningful consequences as a result of malicious agitators. At some point suppressing the expression of that desire for meaningful punishments for wrongdoing crosses the threshold into active endorsement of the wrongdoing. I don't know if we're there yet Dom, but your insistence on enforcing all of the reddit baggage on this site makes me think we're rather close to that threshold as a baseline.
It is absolutely not a healthy reaction to draw and quarter anyone. Even if we were to argue about a sense of justice and closure, that doesn't come from mutilation and torture. Just recently a criminal was given death by firing squad in Florida, and the police did not drink his blood, dismember his corpse, or bludgeon a family member with the body parts of the criminal. This is because we are not insane savages. His execution was the ending of his life and the recognition that he can no longer harm another person, and no amount of Leftist True Crime documentaries from the Innocence project will get him out.
Rejecting wrongdoing for the sake of punishing wrongdoing is the opposite of endorsing wrongdoing.
A healthy reaction would not to be rage baited, and to move on and make positive and affirmative steps to make the world a better place around you with a sense of love, discipline, and justice in your heart. None of that involves chopping people into pieces.
Is it any different from hanging someone by the neck until dead? That's no less torturous, but I'd wager it wouldn't have provoked the same reaction had I advocated that sentence instead. You're being dishonest with yourself.
The point of such sentences is to provide a very public display of punishment that serves to scare the everloving shit out of the rest of the criminally inclined population(read: low IQ, violent and impulsive niggers). They don't understand abstract ideas such as prison but a physical punishment is simple enough that they might be able to understand the implications and not want to end up like their fellow ilk.
Justice requires meting out harsh consequences for vile behavior. No amount of Love and Peace is going to deter the wicked. Failing to dole out said consequences because you want to sit in a circle and sing kumbaya is just cowardice and abandoning responsibility.
Understand the kind of scum you're dealing with and select an appropriate punishment. Not everyone is going to be corrected by a stern lecture and a timeout. Some individuals are human animals and need to be addressed as such. Until we have a homogenous population again, we can't employ your soft weak hippy shit system because it will do nothing to deter niggers from behaving like niggers.