The word "savage" isn't even in the constitution, let alone a racial slur. The fact that public schools are shit is an indictment of society and the public schools. I don't see anyone, even the racialist left, teaching racial slurs to children.
If you want a society worth living in, children have to live in it, and their innocence has to be protected in it in order to raise them correctly. Screaming at children, beating children, belittling children, and hurling racial epithets at children is counter to that, is child abuse, and makes you a bad person constructing a degenerate society.
Slave is most certainly in the constitution. Are you now saying slavery and the bastardized history of it isn’t taught to every American kid at a very young age?
I've made this point a dozen times now. It is not a reference to a race (since anyone could be a slave, including Africans), and it was never taken as a negative connotation of Eastern Europeans, instead it was an explanation to what the Ottomans were doing. It was considered so savage that Turk was considered a slur, used towards anyone behaving savagely.
Slave was never a slur. Turk was a slur, and stopped being one eventually.
Don't throw any racial slurs at children.
The word "savage" isn't even in the constitution, let alone a racial slur. The fact that public schools are shit is an indictment of society and the public schools. I don't see anyone, even the racialist left, teaching racial slurs to children.
If you want a society worth living in, children have to live in it, and their innocence has to be protected in it in order to raise them correctly. Screaming at children, beating children, belittling children, and hurling racial epithets at children is counter to that, is child abuse, and makes you a bad person constructing a degenerate society.
Slave is most certainly in the constitution. Are you now saying slavery and the bastardized history of it isn’t taught to every American kid at a very young age?
Oh, this again?!! "Slave" is a racial slur, you can't make it one.
“Calling an entire race of people owned property isn’t derogatory” can you make a single argument why it isn’t? I would love to see the sperging.
I've made this point a dozen times now. It is not a reference to a race (since anyone could be a slave, including Africans), and it was never taken as a negative connotation of Eastern Europeans, instead it was an explanation to what the Ottomans were doing. It was considered so savage that Turk was considered a slur, used towards anyone behaving savagely.
Slave was never a slur. Turk was a slur, and stopped being one eventually.