Slave is most certainly in the constitution. Are you now saying slavery and the bastardized history of it isn’t taught to every American kid at a very young age?
I've made this point a dozen times now. It is not a reference to a race (since anyone could be a slave, including Africans), and it was never taken as a negative connotation of Eastern Europeans, instead it was an explanation to what the Ottomans were doing. It was considered so savage that Turk was considered a slur, used towards anyone behaving savagely.
Slave was never a slur. Turk was a slur, and stopped being one eventually.
I've made this point a dozen times now. It is not a reference to a race (since anyone could be a slave, including Africans)
And anyone can be a nigger. Doesn’t mean both weren’t predicted on a race.
and it was never taken as a negative connotation of Eastern Europeans, instead it was an explanation to what the Ottomans were doing.
This is not only false, it is a complete fabrication, the ottomans were not the only ones taking slaves, all of Europe did as well. They changed the word from Servitus to sclavus BECUASE THEY VIEWED SLAVS AS LESSER HUMANS AND OWNED PROPERTY. It’s is hilariously so well documented that numerous Latin writings describe Slavs as the perfect slaves.
It was considered so savage that Turk was considered a slur, used towards anyone behaving savagely.
Complete fabrication again. Turk was a slur created by Muslim Ottoman ruling classes to disparage their Anatolian subjects, the turkoman. Color me shocked you make up literally everything you just said.
Slave is most certainly in the constitution. Are you now saying slavery and the bastardized history of it isn’t taught to every American kid at a very young age?
Oh, this again?!! "Slave" is a racial slur, you can't make it one.
“Calling an entire race of people owned property isn’t derogatory” can you make a single argument why it isn’t? I would love to see the sperging.
I've made this point a dozen times now. It is not a reference to a race (since anyone could be a slave, including Africans), and it was never taken as a negative connotation of Eastern Europeans, instead it was an explanation to what the Ottomans were doing. It was considered so savage that Turk was considered a slur, used towards anyone behaving savagely.
Slave was never a slur. Turk was a slur, and stopped being one eventually.
And anyone can be a nigger. Doesn’t mean both weren’t predicted on a race.
This is not only false, it is a complete fabrication, the ottomans were not the only ones taking slaves, all of Europe did as well. They changed the word from Servitus to sclavus BECUASE THEY VIEWED SLAVS AS LESSER HUMANS AND OWNED PROPERTY. It’s is hilariously so well documented that numerous Latin writings describe Slavs as the perfect slaves.
Complete fabrication again. Turk was a slur created by Muslim Ottoman ruling classes to disparage their Anatolian subjects, the turkoman. Color me shocked you make up literally everything you just said.