Japan has been authoritarian for 99% of its history. Authoritarianism doesn't automatically mean "left wing" . And Japan was run by the military class for most of its history so its been "militarist" for most of its history. Most of the militararists of imperial Japan were descendents of the samurai class anyway.
Also your idea that they used an inverted history is just your opinion, just like its my opinion that you are the one inverting history.
Stop putting words in my mouth you Qatari faggot. I never said authoritarianism was inherently left wing. I said they adopted those traits which are also present in Leftist structures.
You're ignorant to what "militarist" means. An armed aristocracy is not the same as a military junta.
If you can make lies about me saying that i downplayed the grooming gangs and falsely claim that im Qatari than i can put words in your mouth. And i didnt even do that, you were the one who said "while embracing the Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism of Left-wing governments" as a reason for why you consider them leftists.
Also the samurai class was the military class of Japan that just happened to have noble status, its basically the same thing as a military junta except that they had nobility status. the samurai class was started by rogue militias in the first place.
Absolutely not, you're completely backwards. The Samurai Class was the aristocracy, sometimes practicing martial efforts in the same way the Europeans did in the middle ages. The aristocracy used the military as a mechanism for their own social achievement, regardless of whether they ever fought in a single battle or led a single soldier in combat. Militarism requires that society be structured out from the military, and all institutions are governed exclusively by the military, for military purposes.
The samurai became the aristocracy but they started out as rogue militias that had to create a second government to govern the country because the royal family were being too lazy and weren't governing the country and letting criminals go around unchecked. theres a reason why the shogunate (the samurai military government) and the royal family were often competing with each other for political power throughout Japanese history. They were two different entities.
Calling someone a faggot is explicitly allowed, this is not an attack on an identity group. It doesn't seem to be an attack on Qataris as a nationality, just an attack on Telia.
Japan has been authoritarian for 99% of its history. Authoritarianism doesn't automatically mean "left wing" . And Japan was run by the military class for most of its history so its been "militarist" for most of its history. Most of the militararists of imperial Japan were descendents of the samurai class anyway.
Also your idea that they used an inverted history is just your opinion, just like its my opinion that you are the one inverting history.
Stop putting words in my mouth you Qatari faggot. I never said authoritarianism was inherently left wing. I said they adopted those traits which are also present in Leftist structures.
You're ignorant to what "militarist" means. An armed aristocracy is not the same as a military junta.
If you can make lies about me saying that i downplayed the grooming gangs and falsely claim that im Qatari than i can put words in your mouth. And i didnt even do that, you were the one who said "while embracing the Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism of Left-wing governments" as a reason for why you consider them leftists.
Also the samurai class was the military class of Japan that just happened to have noble status, its basically the same thing as a military junta except that they had nobility status. the samurai class was started by rogue militias in the first place.
Absolutely not, you're completely backwards. The Samurai Class was the aristocracy, sometimes practicing martial efforts in the same way the Europeans did in the middle ages. The aristocracy used the military as a mechanism for their own social achievement, regardless of whether they ever fought in a single battle or led a single soldier in combat. Militarism requires that society be structured out from the military, and all institutions are governed exclusively by the military, for military purposes.
This, is not a militarist society, it is an aristocracy exploiting the military.
The samurai became the aristocracy but they started out as rogue militias that had to create a second government to govern the country because the royal family were being too lazy and weren't governing the country and letting criminals go around unchecked. theres a reason why the shogunate (the samurai military government) and the royal family were often competing with each other for political power throughout Japanese history. They were two different entities.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Calling someone a faggot is explicitly allowed, this is not an attack on an identity group. It doesn't seem to be an attack on Qataris as a nationality, just an attack on Telia.