The fact that you not only think this, but have made it seemingly the crux of your entire thought here, clearly shows your bias working backwards from what you want reality to be.
That bias is built on the real world. I personally know people who are racist to black people, who don't love bomb the white race. It's just the mentality of the sweeping majority of all people in the US. Even the sweeping majority of racist whites wouldn't do it.
Also, don't think I didn't notice you used three different names (Nationalists, Supremacists, and Racialists) interchangeably to make your fluffing up of their numbers seem more reasonable. However much overlap they may have, they are not one and the same and to treat them as the same simple little monkeys who'd all just throw every penny they have at a random thot who said nigger is incredibly intellectually dishonest.
I explicitly said I was doing that on purpose because it would inflate the numbers of "White Nationalists" donating to this page because Jared Taylor is not trying to cater to 1%-ers, but both are Racialists of one form or another that will be donating to this page, which is how the original article is using it. I wasn't being dishonest, I was giving you what, why, when, and how.
I personally know people who are racist to black people
And I personally know almost every flavor of anti-black and/or pro-white their is. Its a benefit of growing up in the South, you meet a lot of them because merely existing around blacks creates them.
You know what's a really common trait among most of them? Saying a bunch of shit the more extreme ones say just to piss off the Libs or anyone else that might say it, despite being more milquetoast in their actual beliefs and ideologies. Trolling prissy Yankees and basically guys like you is their ideology, and they know saying shit like that will make you react like this.
They/we get called retarded racists by you/them anyway, why not act the part for the lols?
I wasn't being dishonest, I was giving you what, why, when, and how.
And i pointed out why this was lazy, dishonest, and undermined your entire point. It doesn't matter if you say "I'm gonna make shit up," I'm still gonna say you are making shit up to that. These groups are not the same, they will not all line up to donate to this, and you only had to make up this scenario of a massive all grouped up bloc sincerely posting their ideology on this page to compensate for trying to support that they make up tens of thousands of a population with large amounts of disposable income just for a girl who probably burnt coal anyway.
If you had said they make up a sizable portion of those donating, that'd be believable. But trying to stand on them being the primary donors with most other whites either not knowing or not caring is a foolish assumption.
I'm not trying to conflate these groups, I'm trying to maximize the number of people who would be under the legacy media's definition of a White Nationalist in order to not completely discount the entire movement. Otherwise I'd have to say there are maybe ten thousand White Nationalists in the US, and therefore it's not possible to know where any of these donations are coming from, since we know it's not coming from normies, or even Conservatives.
Most people don't know about the daily political issue of the week. Most whites do not know about this. Of the ones who do, most do not care. Of the ones who care, most will not support her actions. Of the ones who will support her actions, most will not fund. The remainder will fund, and that remainder is toing to be heavily made up of White Nationalists, and the comments reflected that. Hence, yeah, they are the primary source of funding.
I'm trying to maximize the number of people who would be under the legacy media's definition of a White Nationalist
Okay, but you are also using this maximized number to make a point about them somehow being a primary source of donations is where the issue lay. Because while the legacy media might paint them all with the same brush, they themselves do not and a sizable portion will not be participating in this entire thing.
and the comments reflected that
No. I've explained why this is untrue already so you can just refer back to it. But this is a massive assumption based on what you want to things to be and you have worked backwards to every other point based on this assumption.
Okay, but you are also using this maximized number to make a point about them somehow being a primary source of donations is where the issue lay. Because while the legacy media might paint them all with the same brush, they themselves do not and a sizable portion will not be participating in this entire thing.
The alternative is to say that the White Nationalist movement is so small it effectively does not exist in any meaningful way. Maybe 5,000 people in all. And if that's true, all we can assume is that its bots and foreigners, because it isn't the majority population of whites in America.
That bias is built on the real world. I personally know people who are racist to black people, who don't love bomb the white race. It's just the mentality of the sweeping majority of all people in the US. Even the sweeping majority of racist whites wouldn't do it.
I explicitly said I was doing that on purpose because it would inflate the numbers of "White Nationalists" donating to this page because Jared Taylor is not trying to cater to 1%-ers, but both are Racialists of one form or another that will be donating to this page, which is how the original article is using it. I wasn't being dishonest, I was giving you what, why, when, and how.
And I personally know almost every flavor of anti-black and/or pro-white their is. Its a benefit of growing up in the South, you meet a lot of them because merely existing around blacks creates them.
You know what's a really common trait among most of them? Saying a bunch of shit the more extreme ones say just to piss off the Libs or anyone else that might say it, despite being more milquetoast in their actual beliefs and ideologies. Trolling prissy Yankees and basically guys like you is their ideology, and they know saying shit like that will make you react like this.
They/we get called retarded racists by you/them anyway, why not act the part for the lols?
And i pointed out why this was lazy, dishonest, and undermined your entire point. It doesn't matter if you say "I'm gonna make shit up," I'm still gonna say you are making shit up to that. These groups are not the same, they will not all line up to donate to this, and you only had to make up this scenario of a massive all grouped up bloc sincerely posting their ideology on this page to compensate for trying to support that they make up tens of thousands of a population with large amounts of disposable income just for a girl who probably burnt coal anyway.
If you had said they make up a sizable portion of those donating, that'd be believable. But trying to stand on them being the primary donors with most other whites either not knowing or not caring is a foolish assumption.
I'm not trying to conflate these groups, I'm trying to maximize the number of people who would be under the legacy media's definition of a White Nationalist in order to not completely discount the entire movement. Otherwise I'd have to say there are maybe ten thousand White Nationalists in the US, and therefore it's not possible to know where any of these donations are coming from, since we know it's not coming from normies, or even Conservatives.
Most people don't know about the daily political issue of the week. Most whites do not know about this. Of the ones who do, most do not care. Of the ones who care, most will not support her actions. Of the ones who will support her actions, most will not fund. The remainder will fund, and that remainder is toing to be heavily made up of White Nationalists, and the comments reflected that. Hence, yeah, they are the primary source of funding.
Okay, but you are also using this maximized number to make a point about them somehow being a primary source of donations is where the issue lay. Because while the legacy media might paint them all with the same brush, they themselves do not and a sizable portion will not be participating in this entire thing.
No. I've explained why this is untrue already so you can just refer back to it. But this is a massive assumption based on what you want to things to be and you have worked backwards to every other point based on this assumption.
The alternative is to say that the White Nationalist movement is so small it effectively does not exist in any meaningful way. Maybe 5,000 people in all. And if that's true, all we can assume is that its bots and foreigners, because it isn't the majority population of whites in America.