The alternatives are not as developed. One possible alternative is Sessions. It is basically an IRC chat room with more security features. It does support link preview if you want it.
This bot is the thing that we were against when it happened to us on Reddit when they started handing out bans in other subs for posting on KiA.
"But they're groomers!" Uh huh. And we were all nazis and fascists.
Letting one bot dev unilaterally implemented cross-server bans a gigantic can of worms and should be prevented by any platform's ToS. Otherwise, that approach becomes popular and it balkanizes the service.
That is a completely separate question from if Discord should ban the servers in question, but the bot should not be allowed.
And this video author feeling the need to distance himself from the Indian/Canadian in the title of that one video makes me think he's not a reliable source.
TL;DR: It appears the real reason Discord banned the bot was because he talked shit about the furry community and made another bot that targeted furries who liked porn, and discord staff are well known to be furries who love to ban people who talk shit about the community by using harassment as the go-to excuse.
And because it mentioned the discord cub exception drama, I am just going to state that I disagree with the video for bashing lolisho, and believe that discord should have allowed lolisho on the site as only retards consider it pedophilic, even if some countries decide to block it.
Have a good list? I'm horrible when it comes to finding things.
The alternatives are not as developed. One possible alternative is Sessions. It is basically an IRC chat room with more security features. It does support link preview if you want it.
Well yea, the groomers and predators run Discord.
Discord is in the right here.
This bot is the thing that we were against when it happened to us on Reddit when they started handing out bans in other subs for posting on KiA.
"But they're groomers!" Uh huh. And we were all nazis and fascists.
Letting one bot dev unilaterally implemented cross-server bans a gigantic can of worms and should be prevented by any platform's ToS. Otherwise, that approach becomes popular and it balkanizes the service.
That is a completely separate question from if Discord should ban the servers in question, but the bot should not be allowed.
And this video author feeling the need to distance himself from the Indian/Canadian in the title of that one video makes me think he's not a reliable source.
Interesting new upstart:
https://www.ventrilo.com/
If you didn't realize Discord was pozzed until now they're you're either incredibly ill informed or you're a moron.
TL;DR: It appears the real reason Discord banned the bot was because he talked shit about the furry community and made another bot that targeted furries who liked porn, and discord staff are well known to be furries who love to ban people who talk shit about the community by using harassment as the go-to excuse.
And because it mentioned the discord cub exception drama, I am just going to state that I disagree with the video for bashing lolisho, and believe that discord should have allowed lolisho on the site as only retards consider it pedophilic, even if some countries decide to block it.
Ok Rapax.