Not lefty friends, says vikings don't like being replaced
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
All too well.
You do know that nearly all American right-wingers who voted, voted for George W. Bush? I guess they also love immigration.
Either. I'm not that fond of robbing people and taking them as slaves.
Not that strange. Makes sense that it would be named after its best practitioners. Maybe Corsairs?
I guess that would also be why all civilized lands fell so easily to the Mongols, whose hunting experience was great for fighting humans as well.
You think the majority of the R electorate is over sixty? Stats don't pan out that way. Particularly since Trump has had success digging up right wing first time voters in 2016 who had been waiting for nationalism. Bush's most fervent followers are now publicly Democrats anyway, the neocons were never anything but D in disguise.
Oh that's right I forgot you were an atheist, morals don't enter into your thinking. Hence all the relativism.
A term specific to Barbary Coast mohammadan pirates of the early 1800s. Only in modern times(as most retardations) has it become synonymous with the term "pirate". The Barbary Coast muslims largely practiced it not for capturing ships but for taking of slaves.
You guess wrong. The West fell to the Mongols so easily because they had a doctrinal outmatch, not a lack of trained soldiery. At the time the West had plenty of professional armies, but they weren't prepared for an exclusively ranged cavalry opponent. Hence why the conquests fell so quickly after the Mongols lost momentum, because their various enemies adapted within a generation.
Besides dude, what do you think they hunted in the 1100s that required a swarm of horse archers to kill? It's not like the Mongols subsisted entirely on elephants or something.