Trump told Israelis trying to start ww3 no.
(twitter.com)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
USS Liberty 2.0 in 5 ... 4 ...
Doubtful it's that low.
CIA/Mossad made up Iraqi WMDeez and since then U.K./Israel are pumping/stealing Iraqi oil. They've already done the same to others in the region using same tired excuse, muh terrorists... Who's next? Iran!!!! Just sayn
At least 2025...
I think Israel would actually catch some smoke this time. Trump is friendlier to Israel than I'd like but he has no problems bombing the shit out of people
Auto correct is horseshit
Watch Mossad stage a Terrorist attack and blame it on Iran.
Don't even need to necessarily stage it.. They have plenty of enemies.
They just need to allow it to happen, like they did on oct7
They need to coax is along, similar to feds honeypotting men domestically.
If Iran and China were discussing striking USA/Israel nuclear sites, this would be considered a direct threat of military action and met with appropriate response.
Chosenites think consequences are for goys.
1920s: The jews are our misfortune.
2020s: The jews are everyone's misfortune!
Good. Very good.
Now he just needs to stand his ground, and not let himself get emotionally or financially manipulated.
You ran on peace, please see it through. America and Americans First!
Trump does have some history of making Israel play ball at least partially with him. He has a few times made them either cease or contribute something before going back to riding their dick.
Its still far too lenient for anyone's liking by a mile, but it does give him a little spark of genuineness to his plans.
Yup. He's definitely a hardcore Zionist, whether that's by true belief, habit, or influence of others nearby, but he's still more rational and pragmatic about it than many others, which I appreciate.
I think he does recognize we're not getting the best deal from all this, and he's all about deals.
Yup, agree completely. "Zion Don" isn't a completely unfair moniker by any means (although I'd argue it's usually also a blackpill/demoralization attack, even if true), but it's not like he's worse than other options...and at least he's also getting some good stuff done. I wish he'd stop dick riding Israel, to use your phrase, but it's not like this is the absolute worst. Unless he starts shit with Iran; that would lose me for good.
People are so black and white on this they often miss the forest for the trees. I wish he wasn't so pro-Israel. I definitely wish he wasn't appointing and surrounding himself with so many Zionist lunatics. But it's not like we had any viable options who wouldn't have done the exact same thing. Heck, Kamala basically campaigned on being the WW3 Candidate. I'll still take Trump any day of the week.
They absolutely would have done worse and we'd not even know about 1/10th of it.
Harris might have talked a lot of shit about pro-Palestine, but her party and handlers would have continued the pro-Israel agenda exactly as it had been for decades without the media even talking about it. Just bills signed in silence and money/arms shipped without a peep.
Regardless of how you feel about Trump, he is rarely able to keep his mouth shut about anything, and the media will absolutely blast everything he doesn't say. So in the "both are bad" categories, at least we know and might be able to say/do something with him.
On that note, Hegseth has been sabre-rattling on Iran a bit too much for my liking too. I like what seems to be a military DEI purge on his orders, but I think he's chomping at the bit for unnecessary bloodshed.
Sabre-rattling can deter sabre drawing.
Just ask the rattle snake why it rattles its rattle.
Article, archived. It's NYT, and a lot of anonymous sources, as per usual, so take it with a grain of salt.
If true, good on these guys.
Not a fan of the second part, but still generally good.
Hahaha.
Ah, man. You were doing so well.
Still, if this reporting is true, at least it's a sign they're not jumping right to war, and will try to do things peacefully.
Although, as others have mentioned...serious USS Liberty energy potentially brewing.
Thanks for the archive link.
Also, NY Times is up to it's old shenanigans with headlines.
They don't describe any divisions within the trump admin though. It's "2 people said this would need US support if it happened, and a whole pile of people said we shouldn't do it". I don't see any division there.
Not to mention:
https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-2051523
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/03/gabbard-iran-is-not-currently-developing-nuclear-weapons
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-threatens-iran-over-nukes-dni-gabbard-claims-tehran-not-building-bombs
He sure does love pulling their chairs out and kissing their wall
That's weird, I've been seeing Hitler's strongest Mexicans explaining that we're going to attack Iran on behalf of Israel for months. Have they actually been retarded this whole time?
Hitler's strongest Mexicans??? What have I missed?