You are fully aware that all of them were white, I don't think it was ever identified that any of them were jews, and one of them was a pedophile. The other two were a communist, and a domestic abuser.
Given this and your recent calls for race war, it appears that you are a forum sliding brigand.
It's easy to look up. Rittenhouse shot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Joseph Rosenbaum - 100% jew. It's among the most jewiest names possible.
Gaige Grosskreutz - Quite a jewish name, and indeed has family and neighbors who are jewish.
Anthony Huber - Uncertain, but it appears to be a jewish family name.
You are fully aware that all of them were white
Wrong, jews are not White, they consider themselves something else. In fact they like to switch around as needed, but they internally they consider themselves distinct from Whites. To which we all can happily agree.
So your accusation is defamatory (accusing of lying) and based on ignorance.
I don't think it was ever identified that any of them were jews
Your ignorance is not an argument. At least 2, likely 3 out of 3 were jews.
The other two were a communist
All 3 were communists. Weren't they literally all members of Antifa anyway? Antifa was originally created as a violent arm of jewish communists in Germany, and it appears to still be that, but internationally.
Given this
Your premises are wrong. Just admit that you exert tyrannical janitorial powers all due to ideological reasons. At least don't lie and pretend you are something you are clearly not.
It's certain for at least 2 out of 3. and for the third one it's just "likely" (50%+). It doesn't matter what YOU think about that, especially if you put up unreasonable levels of scrutiny. But to normal people it is enough evidence to confidently claim that. If anything, it would be an unexpected surprise if it weren't true. It's not a court, and in dubio pro reo does not apply.
And you just ban people out of personal whim. Have you even bothered to look it up before you ban people out of your personal disagreement?
You literally do not know that they are jews
How many Whites have you ever seen who are named Muhammad? Clearly the name is a strong indicator of origin, just as skin color is a strong indicator of race, and education/profession is a strong indicator of IQ.
Normal people don't scream incessently about "early life" and are not paranoid of jews. So, don't evoke what normal people consider to be evidence, because then you would have even less than what you have now.
As for being in court, you can not establish that someone is secretly a jew because you saw a surname and assumed their religion.
How many Whites have you ever seen who are named Muhammad?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
You are fully aware that all of them were white, I don't think it was ever identified that any of them were jews, and one of them was a pedophile. The other two were a communist, and a domestic abuser.
Given this and your recent calls for race war, it appears that you are a forum sliding brigand.
It's easy to look up. Rittenhouse shot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Joseph Rosenbaum - 100% jew. It's among the most jewiest names possible.
Gaige Grosskreutz - Quite a jewish name, and indeed has family and neighbors who are jewish.
Anthony Huber - Uncertain, but it appears to be a jewish family name.
Wrong, jews are not White, they consider themselves something else. In fact they like to switch around as needed, but they internally they consider themselves distinct from Whites. To which we all can happily agree.
So your accusation is defamatory (accusing of lying) and based on ignorance.
Your ignorance is not an argument. At least 2, likely 3 out of 3 were jews.
All 3 were communists. Weren't they literally all members of Antifa anyway? Antifa was originally created as a violent arm of jewish communists in Germany, and it appears to still be that, but internationally.
Your premises are wrong. Just admit that you exert tyrannical janitorial powers all due to ideological reasons. At least don't lie and pretend you are something you are clearly not.
Again, your evidence is: "surname, surname, i don't know but surname?"
You literally do not know that they are jews, but you want them to be jews because it suits your agenda and nothing else.
It's certain for at least 2 out of 3. and for the third one it's just "likely" (50%+). It doesn't matter what YOU think about that, especially if you put up unreasonable levels of scrutiny. But to normal people it is enough evidence to confidently claim that. If anything, it would be an unexpected surprise if it weren't true. It's not a court, and in dubio pro reo does not apply.
And you just ban people out of personal whim. Have you even bothered to look it up before you ban people out of your personal disagreement?
How many Whites have you ever seen who are named Muhammad? Clearly the name is a strong indicator of origin, just as skin color is a strong indicator of race, and education/profession is a strong indicator of IQ.
Normal people don't scream incessently about "early life" and are not paranoid of jews. So, don't evoke what normal people consider to be evidence, because then you would have even less than what you have now.
As for being in court, you can not establish that someone is secretly a jew because you saw a surname and assumed their religion.
Several. Turns out Muslims aren't a race either.