In your view, the highest level of ancestry grouping doesn't have a name for itself, it's just "supercategory".
Yeah it does, its called human. It begins there to differentiate us from the other apes. Then it breaks down into the big three, which are hugely vague but still noticeable separations. And then it just keeps breaking down to more and more specialized groupings.
I cannot even follow your logic any longer beyond "nu uh."
I cannot even follow your logic any longer beyond "nu uh."
No doubt. Have you ever in your life seen a "race" question on any document you ever filled out that listed Iberian? FBI crime data broken down by Celts vs Polacks. lol.
Even on the census they have write-ins for Ancestry not race - OMB defines race as White, Black, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander and so does census.
Good lord man, you're allowed to admit you're wrong.
I've also not seen them list Jew, and most of the time Latino is categorized as "White" with a whole different question for Hispanic as something not racial as it has its own question.
But I feel like you might consider those two "not white." So clearly you only appeal to authority when you think it benefits you without thinking. But glad the Federal Government is what you think of as someone you should cite on race.
There is nothing to admit to being wrong about, I'd happily do so if you said anything that might give me pause. But so far you can't even address the point other than "nu uh."
Those are the literal definitions in the dictionary. You can google it yourself, or whichever your preferred engine is. Even when they are trying to abolish the very idea of race as a whole, they still use that definition.
I do notice you dodged both the question of "are Jews white" and "is the federal government a trustable source to you?" just so you can hide behind insults.
Yeah it does, its called human. It begins there to differentiate us from the other apes. Then it breaks down into the big three, which are hugely vague but still noticeable separations. And then it just keeps breaking down to more and more specialized groupings.
I cannot even follow your logic any longer beyond "nu uh."
No doubt. Have you ever in your life seen a "race" question on any document you ever filled out that listed Iberian? FBI crime data broken down by Celts vs Polacks. lol.
Even on the census they have write-ins for Ancestry not race - OMB defines race as White, Black, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander and so does census.
Good lord man, you're allowed to admit you're wrong.
I've also not seen them list Jew, and most of the time Latino is categorized as "White" with a whole different question for Hispanic as something not racial as it has its own question.
But I feel like you might consider those two "not white." So clearly you only appeal to authority when you think it benefits you without thinking. But glad the Federal Government is what you think of as someone you should cite on race.
There is nothing to admit to being wrong about, I'd happily do so if you said anything that might give me pause. But so far you can't even address the point other than "nu uh."
lol you have no instance in your entire life to draw upon that agrees with your own personal definition of these words.
Nobody on any race question ever has ever used your definition.
And you still can't admit you're wrong about it. You're a clown.
Those are the literal definitions in the dictionary. You can google it yourself, or whichever your preferred engine is. Even when they are trying to abolish the very idea of race as a whole, they still use that definition.
I do notice you dodged both the question of "are Jews white" and "is the federal government a trustable source to you?" just so you can hide behind insults.
I wonder why that is.