Because polls are simple, empty gestures that require no commitment or action, nor seeing the hard parts of the decision. Polls also said Hillary would win easily, Biden was amazing, and all sorts of other things we know to be manipulated or misleading.
We could make this a breakdown of how statistics work and how they lie as naturally as they breathe, regardless of if they fit your narrative or not.
Polls also showed Trump winning in 2024, and he did. The only weird poll I remember from this past election cycle was the one showing Harris winning Iowa, and it was a clear outlier.
Biden never looked amazing in polls. He had a honeymoon period early on and then dropped and never rebounded.
Despite the shortcomings polls may have, they are better than what you have presented which is literally nothing.
Very key phrase. A great example of how statistics and facts can be manipulated to support your narrative. You can just say "I don't recall" and not be lying or wrong even despite saying untrue or incomplete information.
There were polls everywhere, from hundreds of sources that said Harris not only was winning but was crushing. Were they good? What was their sample size? How was the question posed and was it misleading or vague? Doesn't matter, its a poll saying what they wanted to hear! And when it was proven as wrong as it obviously was, it was discarded from your memory as useless information.
they are better than what you have presented
What was needed to be presented? Considering you already said my points were too confusing for you, I've been trying to simplify it.
Tranny hate doesn't explain why deportation of all illegals polls so well or the French poll I posted above.
Who is they?
Because polls are simple, empty gestures that require no commitment or action, nor seeing the hard parts of the decision. Polls also said Hillary would win easily, Biden was amazing, and all sorts of other things we know to be manipulated or misleading.
We could make this a breakdown of how statistics work and how they lie as naturally as they breathe, regardless of if they fit your narrative or not.
Polls also showed Trump winning in 2024, and he did. The only weird poll I remember from this past election cycle was the one showing Harris winning Iowa, and it was a clear outlier.
Biden never looked amazing in polls. He had a honeymoon period early on and then dropped and never rebounded.
Despite the shortcomings polls may have, they are better than what you have presented which is literally nothing.
Very key phrase. A great example of how statistics and facts can be manipulated to support your narrative. You can just say "I don't recall" and not be lying or wrong even despite saying untrue or incomplete information.
There were polls everywhere, from hundreds of sources that said Harris not only was winning but was crushing. Were they good? What was their sample size? How was the question posed and was it misleading or vague? Doesn't matter, its a poll saying what they wanted to hear! And when it was proven as wrong as it obviously was, it was discarded from your memory as useless information.
What was needed to be presented? Considering you already said my points were too confusing for you, I've been trying to simplify it.
You too are relying on memory.
Evidence