His name is the comics is actually Nathaniel Richards, he's a far future descendant of Reed Richards, aka Mister Fantastic from the Fantastic Four.
The MCU being their usual brand of retards raceswapped him in the Loki series which came back to bite them HARD since the character was being set up as the next phase Thanos big bad. So when the actor was later fired due to being convicted of assaulting a woman the entire plan just collapsed because Marvel couldn't help but raceswap yet another originally white male. So now the emergency pull has swapped out Kang for Doctor Doom hence the Doomsday movie replacing this one in the pic.
His name is the comics is actually Nathaniel Richards, he's a far future descendant of Reed Richards, aka Mister Fantastic from the Fantastic Four.
Doesn't this carry about a thousand asterisks for various retcons, alternate timelines, and fakeouts? Kang is like if there was a personified parody of complicated comic lore, except he's a serious character.
I think Nathaniel is one of the more recent retcons and earlier versions suggested he might have been descended from Doom, but you're not wrong about all the "it was a Doombot all along" twists whenever the character was killed or otherwise defeated. Time travel in general means for paradoxes like that where a character can die before they first meet the people who end up being part of his death when the timelines involved don't run parallel all the time.
It was a perfect shitshow of a meme after they raceswapped the character since the character is literally called Kang and there are countless versions of him from other timelines, realities, and whatever other asspull/handwave Marvel goes with, so not only is "Kangs" plural accurate but it falls so perfectly into the meme it's like some act of divine providence to shitpost about it.
I upvoted, but I'm not any more eager to exchange "capefaggery " for "pixelfaggery". Hollywood used to make monuments like "Ben-Hur," "Lawrence of Arabia," "The Ten Commandments" and then "Fight Club", "No Country for Old Men" and "There Will Be Blood."
You know, REAL cinema? I don't want to consoom Product™.
Likewise, but I think we got the most we could hope for with "The Dark Knight". Not that it was all that profound, but I think that's the best that Pedowood can muster given the state of who occupies leadership and the circus freaks writing screenplays. We'll never get a genuine, profound film so long as they're more concerned with casting x% of blacks, x% of Latinos, x% of women with every production.
Speaking of Nolan, he was forced to race swap characters in his upcoming "The Odyssey" because films that don't cast diversity hires don't qualify for Oscars. With the budget that Universal gave him, nuking their awards qualifications wasn't acceptable to Universal.
The whole Kang thing is so strange. First of all, he's a lot better villain than Thanos but they really dropped the ball on him. Kang can switch bodies and switch his appearance so he could have been the bad guy in years worth of movies before they revealed it was the same guy.
but if you can switch appearances, why stick with a black guy? If you're a villain wouldn't you want to look like someone that doesn't commit crimes? Everyone's going to suspect him right away.
Case in point- the actor playing him
and if you can travel through time and get their knowledge and tech like Kang can, why not maybe stop niggers from being the bottom of the barrel in every era and every timeline?
Teh googles are telling me it's supposed to be released May 1, 2026. They're also saying that "It's dead". Either way I didn't even know this movie was being made until I saw this post.
Man for a moment there I thought it meant we wuz kangz. Kang I'm assuming is a Chinese super hero.
His name is the comics is actually Nathaniel Richards, he's a far future descendant of Reed Richards, aka Mister Fantastic from the Fantastic Four.
The MCU being their usual brand of retards raceswapped him in the Loki series which came back to bite them HARD since the character was being set up as the next phase Thanos big bad. So when the actor was later fired due to being convicted of assaulting a woman the entire plan just collapsed because Marvel couldn't help but raceswap yet another originally white male. So now the emergency pull has swapped out Kang for Doctor Doom hence the Doomsday movie replacing this one in the pic.
Doesn't this carry about a thousand asterisks for various retcons, alternate timelines, and fakeouts? Kang is like if there was a personified parody of complicated comic lore, except he's a serious character.
I think Nathaniel is one of the more recent retcons and earlier versions suggested he might have been descended from Doom, but you're not wrong about all the "it was a Doombot all along" twists whenever the character was killed or otherwise defeated. Time travel in general means for paradoxes like that where a character can die before they first meet the people who end up being part of his death when the timelines involved don't run parallel all the time.
Kang's a villain, who was played by a black guy (which was a race swap), who got memory-holed after being convicted of assault.
"The Kang Dynasty" film got shitcanned and replaced with "Doomsday."
I believe he’s some sort of multi dimensional dude.
WE WAZ KANGS 'N SHEEIT! 🤣
Honestly I always thought that's what people were talking about. He's a formidable foe.
It was a perfect shitshow of a meme after they raceswapped the character since the character is literally called Kang and there are countless versions of him from other timelines, realities, and whatever other asspull/handwave Marvel goes with, so not only is "Kangs" plural accurate but it falls so perfectly into the meme it's like some act of divine providence to shitpost about it.
The era of capefaggery is over. As someone here said it's video game movies' time to dominate.
It's gonna get cringy!
I upvoted, but I'm not any more eager to exchange "capefaggery " for "pixelfaggery". Hollywood used to make monuments like "Ben-Hur," "Lawrence of Arabia," "The Ten Commandments" and then "Fight Club", "No Country for Old Men" and "There Will Be Blood."
You know, REAL cinema? I don't want to consoom Product™.
I was 14 when Pulp Fiction came out and we all knew crime movies would never be the same after.
I want to se3 that happen to a genre again in my lifetime. Sci-fi, comedy or whatever
Likewise, but I think we got the most we could hope for with "The Dark Knight". Not that it was all that profound, but I think that's the best that Pedowood can muster given the state of who occupies leadership and the circus freaks writing screenplays. We'll never get a genuine, profound film so long as they're more concerned with casting x% of blacks, x% of Latinos, x% of women with every production.
Speaking of Nolan, he was forced to race swap characters in his upcoming "The Odyssey" because films that don't cast diversity hires don't qualify for Oscars. With the budget that Universal gave him, nuking their awards qualifications wasn't acceptable to Universal.
Super Smash Bros Universe will be awesome. I hope there is a better version of Castlevania. I also hope Goemon gets a really good show.
Just keep Paul Anderson away from them please. I'm tired of him ruining fucking everything with his talentless wife.
The whole Kang thing is so strange. First of all, he's a lot better villain than Thanos but they really dropped the ball on him. Kang can switch bodies and switch his appearance so he could have been the bad guy in years worth of movies before they revealed it was the same guy.
but if you can switch appearances, why stick with a black guy? If you're a villain wouldn't you want to look like someone that doesn't commit crimes? Everyone's going to suspect him right away.
Case in point- the actor playing him
and if you can travel through time and get their knowledge and tech like Kang can, why not maybe stop niggers from being the bottom of the barrel in every era and every timeline?
they probably made him black, and now they know they're gonna get ripped from both sides for it, though for
differencesdifferent reasons, lmao.part 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/V0GMB2mRwI0k
Teh googles are telling me it's supposed to be released May 1, 2026. They're also saying that "It's dead". Either way I didn't even know this movie was being made until I saw this post.
Probability of me paying money to see it? Zero.
It's not.
thatsthejoke.jpg