Lord Miles made a great tweet about the state of England
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (84)
sorted by:
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
This attitude has been promoted recently, despite the fact that it's complete fiction. Hitler actively sought a war with Britain, but preferably on his own time-tables. Strategically it was necessary to defeat the British control and influence within Europe that had been British policy since prior to the Victorian era. Britain and Germany had been clear rivals since Germany industrialized, which made a war highly likely by every British and German government, especially considering that Germany was going to be directly contested in the North Sea.
Ideologically, National Socialism regarded Britain as the source of Judeo-Capitalism, marking them as intractable enemy.
Historically, Hitler was working with the BUF to create a potential fifth column within the country, but also wanted to work with the SNP to carve up Britain after the war with them had concluded. Rudolf Hess made a secret flight to Britain to try and create some kind of peace negotiations and was roundly condemned by the entire Nazi regime in his attempt.
Not only did Hitler want a war with Britain, but he (and so did most observers) thought such a war was inevitable. You might as well claim that Hitler never wanted to invade Denmark.
There are only two reasons why someone would argue this point:
They're a National Socialist intentionally lying about shit they know to be true (Their ideology explicitly identifies England as Judeo-Capitalist).
They're a grifter trying to make some money selling alt-history nonsense.
Fuck off for another week, you useless piece of shit.
LOL, well said.
This is really low IQ stuff. Uncle Adolf was interested in making war with the USSR not fighting Britain. Germany was a land power but had no answer to British sea power or its globe spanning empire and control of almost all of the worlds major shipping lanes and choke points. The Germans would never have been in a position to challenge Britain's naval power. It was much better for both sides to deal. Germany would have defeated the USSR and rid the world of cancerous Judeo-Bolshevism but probably spent decades trying to digest the lands they had captured and deal with the various new strategic headaches dominating a chunk of Eurasia would have left them with.
Meanwhile both sides probably would have found a balance of power. Its almost certain Britain would have detonated its own atom bomb before the Germans and had jet bombers capable of delivering it. German jet engines were inferior to what Rolls Royce was building and the German bomb project was a joke. With Germany and Britain the dominant powers in Europe we would have had to come to some kind of arrangement where the thought of war was unthinkable like it was between Britain and the United States.
To be fair, it was both. At least if you believe him, he wanted peace in Europe. At one point he thought Britain was was a threat, but wanted to get along with them, and at other points he thought Russia was a rising threat to Europe. He flipflopped or adjusted based on what he saw but, based on the time, he saw both of them as threats and, again, based on time, thought peace or fighting was the best way to combat that threat.
It's not as simple as Dom tries to make it out, but it's also not as simple as "Hitler wanted peace." He, again if you take him at his word, wanted the best for Europe, but his means for doing that changed a few times, and sometimes absolutely involved war. He's not as warmongery as History™ makes him out to be, as far as I can tell, but he was also obviously no peacemaker.
I blame the meth. Paranoia is a symptom of withdrawal.
Hitler only grew disappointed with Britain as time went on, for obvious reasons, but initially he respected the brits and viewed them as a brotherly nation. You cannot blame the man for giving up on that after seeing that cooperating with a alcoholic traitor who does not have the interests of his own people in mind is impossible, while simultaneously the jews who actively work to destroy them walk him on a leash, and voila, I don't think it's a conspiracy to view modern Britain, the posterchild for a failed society, and recognize churchil's efforts in shaping it to be as it is today. It's neither a conspiracy to see Bibi, a living hellspawn (not yet a historic figure), talk about churchil's judeo efforts and unveil a statue of him. Once again people blaming Hitler for stating the obvious.
You mean to tell me you wouldn't condemn your deputy führer for doing this? Do you think if one of the leading british/soviet figures did this stunt but in Germany, that they would not be condemned by their respective officials? I know it's really hard to think for you dom and that your moral compass isn't calibrated properly due to permabanning my previous account for telling a guy who was openly talking about his pedophillic fantasies here to kill himself.