They are both called "pedos" according to these zealots and according to laws like the ones that Texas is trying to push, and that they are increasingly trying to make this opinion in to law by giving anime characters the same human rights as real people. .
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (173)
sorted by:
What are they drawings of?
Do you think Dragon ball should be banned because there are sexualized anime minors in the show?
No, just like I don't think family pictures of bath time are CP. You don't need to be disingenuous.
But the fact undoubtedly remains that if you are looking at pictures of bath time, or explicit hentai, and getting your rocks off, when are we allowed to say what you're doing is, at the very least, very questionable behavior?
Ah so you think Bulma flashing herself to other characters to arouse them, and to the audience was fine then is it? You think Goku's dick on screen was ok then was it? You think Goku pulling off Bulma's underwear while she is asleep to feel for her balls, followed by her flashing Roshi the next day her nude lower half with the full ass on display for the audience was fine is it? Why are you pretending like Dragon Ball wouldn't get banned by the bill's wording?
Because I agree the bill is retarded but also think loli is bad. I don't think my stance is impenetrable. I'm not pretending anything and only simply pointing out the obvious. If you thought I was addressing Texas and not the overarching argument then my bad.
And for the record, yes there are questionable things that happen at the start of DB, like Oolong trying to date rape Bulma, but the context of all these scenes is blatantly comedic.
What character? Bulma? She's a late teenager, is her age even revealed? And acting like a couple panty jokes about her is the same as pornographic depictions of literal children is the same is insane. Unless there were hardcore pornographic scenes of children in DB that I'm forgetting?
She was 16 when introduced in the first chapter, and the first panty joke involves Goku pulling off her underwear while she is asleep to feel for her balls, followed by her flashing Roshi the next day her nude lower half with the full ass on display for the audience.
The very first page of the original Dragon Ball manga had Goku's dick front and center as he fished naked. He was 13 at the time.
To act like this wouldn't be called pedo shit and rev up a huge controversy if it was released today is equally insane. That's more than most actual loli focused anime get away with.
This is what I mean. 16 is legal in Japan and in some other places. The Goku feeling for her balls is a funny gag, Goku's dick is a funny gag, no one's jerking off to it. Comparing that to loli porn, which is literally hardcore pornographic of prepubescent girls is ridiculous.
just cut that part? This isn't rocket surgery.
If you think its CP then wouldn't you want to ban the whole show? Because surely the person who made it is a pedo according to your logic . And we can't be having shows made by pedos. Or are you going to be a hypocrite and say that its fine?
Breathe man. Oxygen to the brain. If the plurality of the show isn't questionable then there is no reason to do anything about it. Just get rid of the one part.
But you haven't answered the question. What are they drawings of?
I don't think women's eyes turn into hearts as they stick their tongue out when you rape them either. There are no muscle mommies with giant bazongas...