They are both called "pedos" according to these zealots and according to laws like the ones that Texas is trying to push, and that they are increasingly trying to make this opinion in to law by giving anime characters the same human rights as real people. .
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (173)
sorted by:
Ah so you think Bulma flashing herself to other characters to arouse them, and to the audience was fine then is it? You think Goku's dick on screen was ok then was it? You think Goku pulling off Bulma's underwear while she is asleep to feel for her balls, followed by her flashing Roshi the next day her nude lower half with the full ass on display for the audience was fine is it? Why are you pretending like Dragon Ball wouldn't get banned by the bill's wording?
Because I agree the bill is retarded but also think loli is bad. I don't think my stance is impenetrable. I'm not pretending anything and only simply pointing out the obvious. If you thought I was addressing Texas and not the overarching argument then my bad.
And for the record, yes there are questionable things that happen at the start of DB, like Oolong trying to date rape Bulma, but the context of all these scenes is blatantly comedic.