They are both called "pedos" according to these zealots and according to laws like the ones that Texas is trying to push, and that they are increasingly trying to make this opinion in to law by giving anime characters the same human rights as real people. .
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (173)
sorted by:
She was 16 when introduced in the first chapter, and the first panty joke involves Goku pulling off her underwear while she is asleep to feel for her balls, followed by her flashing Roshi the next day her nude lower half with the full ass on display for the audience.
The very first page of the original Dragon Ball manga had Goku's dick front and center as he fished naked. He was 13 at the time.
To act like this wouldn't be called pedo shit and rev up a huge controversy if it was released today is equally insane. That's more than most actual loli focused anime get away with.
This is what I mean. 16 is legal in Japan and in some other places. The Goku feeling for her balls is a funny gag, Goku's dick is a funny gag, no one's jerking off to it. Comparing that to loli porn, which is literally hardcore pornographic of prepubescent girls is ridiculous.
Lol, lmao even.
So we can have 13 year old prepubsecent boys be fulled naked on screen, as long as everyone pinky promises to never ever jerk off to it?
Got it, I see we are working with a very well defined and strict set of principles that will work very well when turned into laws that define our land.
If you can't see the difference between a gag manga from the 80s and hardcore porn graphic material depicting little girls having sex and being raped (which loli porn does) then you may have some serious issues.
Lol, lmao even.
Any argument can be won if you specifically ignore the point being made, and then keep adding additional evocative adjective to one side to make it sound worse and worse while minimizing the other with two words. Shows how poor your position is.
Also, my point from the start wasn't that I can't, its that the law won't. There is no way to write it in which it can other than broad subjective means that make it useless.
You may as well attest that National Geographic photos of topless natives are pornography. We all know the difference between Goku's caricature and erotica.
Child Porn is a strict liability crime.
If the law or legal officials declare an image as child porn (which is subjective) then just having it on your computer is enough for a conviction.
"Your honor, our legal process identified one pornographic image on @The_Shadow_of_Intent 's computer. It was a full frontal nude of a thirteen year old boy.
There is no question that this image was on his computer, therefore he is guilty."
Your only defense in this case is to admit that you did have an image of a nude boy, and then argue that it is a) a drawing, and b) not porn.
Under laws like this, the court does not have to accept your arguments.
Remember, this is strict liability. Someone sending this image to your email is sufficient to see you charged.
So, how keen are you to place yourself in this position, fully trusting that the legal process will produce a just result?
My point, as illustrated in my first response to him, isn't that I believe there is no difference. Its that the difference is meaningless to the people who push these kinds of laws, and that they and the law will err on the side of "its all bad."
I know the difference between a small chested woman and a child, but for some reason Australia said there wasn't one. You can tell something like Uzaki is clearly just a short college girl, but we had a mass kerfluffle that she was clearly a loli.
Also, I'd wager topless natives are not as common as they once were in those magazines and those specific magazines are for sure no longer allowed in schools because of the same issue I'm talking about. People changed the culture by expanding what they found offensive, and now we do not have nuance. Its all evil and bad to them.
Lol dont waste your time, all of that would get the ban hammer and we both know it.
If you can't see the difference between DB and hardcore pornographic loli then you may have some issues