Look at Zendaya. She’s built like a teenage boy. She has a wide, angular, almost masculine face. Her mixed race hair is a rat’s nest. And her attitude is repellent.
Look at Sydney Sweeney. Knockout body, easy 9 out of 10. Nice skin and hair. Most importantly, she has a great disposition. But her face is borderline downs.
Compare these girls to real generational beauties like Michelle Pfeiffer. It’s not close. And that’s not necessarily an issue. The issue is when they want me to pretend that a 6 is a 10.
Zendaya is for women. Women like women characters they can either identify with or see themselves as. That's why most female characters are bland fill in the blanks. The actress Zendaya is slouchy and masculine, the type that would laugh at a loud belch during an interview. Women like to see themselves as the give no shits, sloppy type women even if they're they opposite. That's why she gets so many roles. Yes, it demeans women.
Sydney Sweeney is fill in the blank blonde with nice tits, what women think men want and nothing more. Yes, it demeans men.
My favorite actresses- Michelle Pfeiffer, Salma Hayek and Emily Blunt
Women want to see other women who are mid because they want to be held to low standards.
Men want to see men that are high rated because we want to aspire to higher standards.
Basically, men want to be better so when something unattainable/difficult is presented, we rise to the occasion. Women, conversely, want the difficult situation made easier for them.
I have no idea who 'Zendaya' is, but I knew exactly who you were talking about halfway through your description. I googled the name, and the results are exactly the same as what came to my mind when reading your post.
It's hard to say, since there's always so much makeup and stuff.
She's not my taste (her face is a bit too stretched, giving her a slightly bug-eyed and stretched look) but I think five is a bit negative. She looks fine, 6 is probably closer. But that's not great, especially for Hollywood and, like you said, she's often cast where you're expected to believe she's a knockout, which she isn't.
It's not really worth trying to analyze too much though, since like I said, Hollywood is weird, and all these people are made up and surgeried to the gills...which they actually might have, I don't know. 5, 6, doesn't really matter. She's not drop dead gorgeous or anything, though. But, mainly, her atrocious personality is really holding her back.
If her face wasn't so dang wide she might be quite pretty. I was curious and was looking up pictures, she actually reminded me a bit like a stretched out Kristen Kreuk, and Kreuk is quite pretty.
But that's not great, especially for Hollywood and, like you said, she's often cast where you're expected to believe she's a knockout, which she isn't.
Yeah, if I saw her out somewhere, I'd think nothing of her. Not ugly, not pretty, just maybe a bit over average (if for no other reason, simply because she's not a hambeast).
But we're expected to pretend that she's the most beautiful thing in the world, and that's a level of gaslighting that nobody should put up with.
Nobody would even care about her looks, except they forced us to.
Kind of like nobody would care about Michael Brown or George Floyd, but they forced us to.
They invert reality and then demand that we accept it.
They invert reality and then demand that we accept it.
Many such cases.
Not saying "our side" is correct about everything, but progressives are completely disconnected/opposed to reality, and it's one of the big problems. All their ideologies are based on how they want things to be, not how they are. Which would be fine, maybe even admirable, if they realized you can't build on a foundation of dreams. You build on a foundation of reality, and try to make the result your dream, through hard work. Something they're allergic to on all ends.
She’s a 5 who’s cast as a 9 in every role. The Hollywood it girls have gotten staggeringly uglier the more they tried to “diversify”.
The downgrade has been wild.
Look at Zendaya. She’s built like a teenage boy. She has a wide, angular, almost masculine face. Her mixed race hair is a rat’s nest. And her attitude is repellent.
Look at Sydney Sweeney. Knockout body, easy 9 out of 10. Nice skin and hair. Most importantly, she has a great disposition. But her face is borderline downs.
Compare these girls to real generational beauties like Michelle Pfeiffer. It’s not close. And that’s not necessarily an issue. The issue is when they want me to pretend that a 6 is a 10.
Zendaya is for women. Women like women characters they can either identify with or see themselves as. That's why most female characters are bland fill in the blanks. The actress Zendaya is slouchy and masculine, the type that would laugh at a loud belch during an interview. Women like to see themselves as the give no shits, sloppy type women even if they're they opposite. That's why she gets so many roles. Yes, it demeans women.
Sydney Sweeney is fill in the blank blonde with nice tits, what women think men want and nothing more. Yes, it demeans men.
My favorite actresses- Michelle Pfeiffer, Salma Hayek and Emily Blunt
Women want to see other women who are mid because they want to be held to low standards.
Men want to see men that are high rated because we want to aspire to higher standards.
Basically, men want to be better so when something unattainable/difficult is presented, we rise to the occasion. Women, conversely, want the difficult situation made easier for them.
My top hotties
Michelle Pfeiffer
ScoJo
Olivia Munn
Salma Hayek
Penelope Cruz
Rose Byrne
Linda Cardellini
I have no idea who 'Zendaya' is, but I knew exactly who you were talking about halfway through your description. I googled the name, and the results are exactly the same as what came to my mind when reading your post.
It's hard to say, since there's always so much makeup and stuff.
She's not my taste (her face is a bit too stretched, giving her a slightly bug-eyed and stretched look) but I think five is a bit negative. She looks fine, 6 is probably closer. But that's not great, especially for Hollywood and, like you said, she's often cast where you're expected to believe she's a knockout, which she isn't.
It's not really worth trying to analyze too much though, since like I said, Hollywood is weird, and all these people are made up and surgeried to the gills...which they actually might have, I don't know. 5, 6, doesn't really matter. She's not drop dead gorgeous or anything, though. But, mainly, her atrocious personality is really holding her back.
If her face wasn't so dang wide she might be quite pretty. I was curious and was looking up pictures, she actually reminded me a bit like a stretched out Kristen Kreuk, and Kreuk is quite pretty.
Yeah, if I saw her out somewhere, I'd think nothing of her. Not ugly, not pretty, just maybe a bit over average (if for no other reason, simply because she's not a hambeast).
But we're expected to pretend that she's the most beautiful thing in the world, and that's a level of gaslighting that nobody should put up with.
Nobody would even care about her looks, except they forced us to.
Kind of like nobody would care about Michael Brown or George Floyd, but they forced us to.
They invert reality and then demand that we accept it.
Many such cases.
Not saying "our side" is correct about everything, but progressives are completely disconnected/opposed to reality, and it's one of the big problems. All their ideologies are based on how they want things to be, not how they are. Which would be fine, maybe even admirable, if they realized you can't build on a foundation of dreams. You build on a foundation of reality, and try to make the result your dream, through hard work. Something they're allergic to on all ends.
6 is still too generous in my eyes unless someone does something about those eyebrows.