A lot of people hold an impossible standard of evidence for the existence of evil. For example, what would it take to convince people that this pope is evil? Most of his actions point to it, but that “evidence” is somehow inconclusive to most people. He holds the office, and he says he’s a good guy, so why wouldn’t I believe him?
The truth is most people require a declaration of intent in order to believe that someone is evil. So the pope would need to literally declare his intent to destroy the church before people recognize that he intends to destroy the church. And yet such a declaration is a Darwinian impossibility because it would be antithetical to the mission of destroying the church; if evil announces itself, then it invites the opposition that will prevent it.
I guess this is just a roundabout way of saying that the people are credulous, gullible retards. And this behavior is at the very center of all leftist movements. If leftists were honest about what they want, most people would rise up and crush them. So why would leftists ever be honest? And why do people listen to leftist lies when basic game theory says that leftists are incentivized to lie?
Realizing something evil or harmful is happening is like a call to action. Denying it means you don’t have to act. That’s why its hard to get people to do anything or even acknowledge there’s something wrong. As long as they have their bread and circuses they will stay complacent.
You mean well meaning but naive normies, right? Because liberal NPCs believe whatever they are told - like "Elon Musk is Nazi." Or maybe to your point they wouldn't have believed it until they were shown a picture of him doing a "nazi salute" and that was the key evidence they needed.
A lot of people hold an impossible standard of evidence for the existence of evil. For example, what would it take to convince people that this pope is evil? Most of his actions point to it, but that “evidence” is somehow inconclusive to most people. He holds the office, and he says he’s a good guy, so why wouldn’t I believe him?
The truth is most people require a declaration of intent in order to believe that someone is evil. So the pope would need to literally declare his intent to destroy the church before people recognize that he intends to destroy the church. And yet such a declaration is a Darwinian impossibility because it would be antithetical to the mission of destroying the church; if evil announces itself, then it invites the opposition that will prevent it.
I guess this is just a roundabout way of saying that the people are credulous, gullible retards. And this behavior is at the very center of all leftist movements. If leftists were honest about what they want, most people would rise up and crush them. So why would leftists ever be honest? And why do people listen to leftist lies when basic game theory says that leftists are incentivized to lie?
Realizing something evil or harmful is happening is like a call to action. Denying it means you don’t have to act. That’s why its hard to get people to do anything or even acknowledge there’s something wrong. As long as they have their bread and circuses they will stay complacent.
You mean well meaning but naive normies, right? Because liberal NPCs believe whatever they are told - like "Elon Musk is Nazi." Or maybe to your point they wouldn't have believed it until they were shown a picture of him doing a "nazi salute" and that was the key evidence they needed.
You'd think the Epstein thing would be enough, and yet...