It is. You have a group (people who have been 'conscious' the last decade or two), and declared that if I have xy belief then I cannot possibly be part of that group in good faith. It's literally no true Scotsman.
Now this is a logical fallacy, i.e. a strawman argument.
It's kind of what's implied by your comment. You brush conservative comments that talk about killing people off as "spicy takes," but the point of the thread is admonishing liberals who call for conservatives to be killed. What's the difference?
“ nobody who has been conscious for the last decade or two would ever claim what you just did.”
No true Scotsman.
So, when you do it, it’s spicy takes, but when liberals do it, it should be taken seriously. That doesn’t really add up.
Doubling down on wrong doesn’t make you any more right. It isn't a no true Scotsman. It's just a nicer way of calling you an idiot or a liar.
Now this is a logical fallacy, i.e. a strawman argument.
Probably because you are an idiot and can't do the math.
It is. You have a group (people who have been 'conscious' the last decade or two), and declared that if I have xy belief then I cannot possibly be part of that group in good faith. It's literally no true Scotsman.
It's kind of what's implied by your comment. You brush conservative comments that talk about killing people off as "spicy takes," but the point of the thread is admonishing liberals who call for conservatives to be killed. What's the difference?