I love that now fact checking works against the liberals. The workers there must be seething everytime that they fact check something like this or "Africa got 6 billion dollars to promote LGBT" instead of "Wearing masks actually works" like they used to.
They don't care about truth. They only use "fact checking" to use our own standards of truth against us. They even have a term used for this argumentation style: Pilpul
It's not that CNN thought it was too ridiculous to be true. It's an idea laundering tactic that has been consistently employed for the better part of a decade now.
"Fact-check" a claim in a way that is politically advantageous for your cause.
Collaborate with other news outlets so they publish the same narrative.
Have the mid-witted retardditors of the world "correct" dissenters and show that they are very intellectualisms by referencing your publication ad-nauseum.
Wait until the narrative has ingrained itself into the minds of the NPCs.
Silently correct the record and act as if it never happened, so your publication doesn't completely lose credibility.
While consuming copious amount of various drugs. From hard recreational drugs to muscle relaxers.
The real reason for the “study” was kickbacks to the politicians who approved it.
Consensus manufacturing complex.
Okay, so they're talking about sexually deviant, biological males being more likely to have AIDS.
I know the answer to that one. Can I have 8 million dollars?
USAID was going to wriite you a check - but you need to give an answer that panders to the democrat voting base.
If you don't intend to wash your eyeballs with lye today don't google 'bug chasers'
Poor mice
I love that now fact checking works against the liberals. The workers there must be seething everytime that they fact check something like this or "Africa got 6 billion dollars to promote LGBT" instead of "Wearing masks actually works" like they used to.
They don't care about truth. They only use "fact checking" to use our own standards of truth against us. They even have a term used for this argumentation style: Pilpul
It's not that CNN thought it was too ridiculous to be true. It's an idea laundering tactic that has been consistently employed for the better part of a decade now.
"Fact-check" a claim in a way that is politically advantageous for your cause.
Collaborate with other news outlets so they publish the same narrative.
Have the mid-witted retardditors of the world "correct" dissenters and show that they are very intellectualisms by referencing your publication ad-nauseum.
Wait until the narrative has ingrained itself into the minds of the NPCs.
Silently correct the record and act as if it never happened, so your publication doesn't completely lose credibility.