The donor said the death penalty should not be politicized but said they are concerned, given Trump’s executive order, that it will continue to be.
“I am also concerned about the severe infringement on the defendant’s right to a fair trial and due process, since his juries are effectively pre-tainted,” they added.
I feel confident in assuming the donor is both retarded and a liar. The "tainting" of the jury pool and the political nature of the crime is Mangione's best defense. This isn't a trial about whether Mangione did it - we all already know he's guilty by the letter of the law - it's all up to whether the jury refuses to convict on the grounds that the CEO of the country's worst health insurer deserved to be considered an outlaw.
Yeah if they are denying claims at 3x the rate other insurers are, either they're serving a very different population with a very different product, or they're killing people. No sympathy.
Literally the more "tainted" the jury pool is the better chance he has.
By any definition of a "Fair" trial he would be given a harsh sentence, as anything less is admitting the man he killed deserved neither and the law has no meaning to even pretend to be "Fair" anymore.
They are literally just using emotional buzzwords to manipulate people into acting like black = white. Which, if you want him to walk just say it and a huge amount of people will agree with you, but this loser prissy footing around acting principled while actively promoting the breaking down of principles is pathetic.
I feel confident in assuming the donor is both retarded and a liar. The "tainting" of the jury pool and the political nature of the crime is Mangione's best defense. This isn't a trial about whether Mangione did it - we all already know he's guilty by the letter of the law - it's all up to whether the jury refuses to convict on the grounds that the CEO of the country's worst health insurer deserved to be considered an outlaw.
Yeah if they are denying claims at 3x the rate other insurers are, either they're serving a very different population with a very different product, or they're killing people. No sympathy.
Literally the more "tainted" the jury pool is the better chance he has.
By any definition of a "Fair" trial he would be given a harsh sentence, as anything less is admitting the man he killed deserved neither and the law has no meaning to even pretend to be "Fair" anymore.
They are literally just using emotional buzzwords to manipulate people into acting like black = white. Which, if you want him to walk just say it and a huge amount of people will agree with you, but this loser prissy footing around acting principled while actively promoting the breaking down of principles is pathetic.
I think the cinematic perp walk was the taint of all jury tainting