The New Queen of "Cuckservative" Movement EXPOSED!
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
So you think RFK Jr. and Tulsi should have been rejected, or am I not getting you correctly?
RFK is in a position to do nothing regarding such a policy, and he literally describes a vision he prayed to receive from God as his life's mission to save children from disease and unhealthy living. Whatever his particular stance is on it, its unlikely to be the majority's.
And the same applies with Tulsi's position, but I'd absolutely reject a woman to lead anything like the position she is given. But I'm a minority in my own party regarding women's "rights."
I'm willing to compromise on more reasonable positions (safety, disease, etc the rare cases) to push my goals further (of which this is necessary to reach that further goal), but not willing to compromise on the issue as a whole.
I think we're talking past each other.
You say: "I'm not changing my opinion on abortion." But that is not what I was talking about. It was about being welcoming to people who disagree, which you do, and which I pointed out the anti-abortion movement also does - as opposed to the Very Online Right, which makes heresy-hunting a hobby.
I do, because my politics are extremes that I know cannot be accomplished without steps first. Years of being outcasted for misogyny and racism (before those became cool again) will make you willing to do so.
But many on the Right do not share that position and their principles make them single issue voters just as much as the Left. The "Very-Online" has different heresies it hunts (like saying anything remotely less than "Gas the Kikes 1488" in every thread), but plenty in real life also do.
Look at what happened to Dan Crenshaw overnight about his gun stance. That's the most common one, in fact that you can see makes up the majority of the Right even.
What racism? I've seen you talk about 'niggers', but never anything hateful.
Sure. They may be single-issue voters, but I don't mean exactly that. I mean the kind of heresy-hunting idiocy that only gets in the way of accomplishing your goals.
Eh, there are plenty of reasons to despise Crenshaw. As EU, I don't care that much about guns either way, but he's a RINO on so many other subjects - like war, social issues, that he is rightly called Eyepatch McCain.
If it's just guns, it's funny because his heresy is supporting ' red flag laws' (if I understand it correctly) which Trump also supported.