She is airing dirty laundry incredibly publicly, trying to manipulate social pressure and cancel mobs to force him to respond to her unsubstantiated claims and give her what she wants. And trying to pull the "PEDO PEDO PEDO" card to have the media tar and feather him.
Even if the assumption is true, she is being horrifically unreasonable to the point where no one should care if it is and she should be shamed and attacked for her attempt to do so.
For what purpose? This only exists to tear him down by making him look bad, because he is pissing off powerful people with his DOGE stooges.
It has no other benefit, certainly not to the child's (the only moral reason you could argue its for), so even acknowledging it as a major talking point is helping the Cancel Mob attack him for no other benefit.
He isn't a leader, we aren't electing him, he shouldn't be anyone's hero (based on a long history), he is a hired goon by Trump to do a job and his personal life is irrelevant to that. Just like you and me.
No, I'm preaching that women shouldn't be believed if they limp in with weak shit, and they should be shamed if not punished for doing so with malicious intent regardless of the truth of the matter.
That is morally wrong to support, because its upholding an evil system that allows women to demand men give them a response on any claim they make and be given privileged positions in society on being inherently trustworthy status.
And because that evil tool is being used with political intent to stop something I voted to have happen (for Trump, who appointed Musk to do it), I will voice against it.
She is airing dirty laundry incredibly publicly, trying to manipulate social pressure and cancel mobs to force him to respond to her unsubstantiated claims and give her what she wants. And trying to pull the "PEDO PEDO PEDO" card to have the media tar and feather him.
Even if the assumption is true, she is being horrifically unreasonable to the point where no one should care if it is and she should be shamed and attacked for her attempt to do so.
For what purpose? This only exists to tear him down by making him look bad, because he is pissing off powerful people with his DOGE stooges.
It has no other benefit, certainly not to the child's (the only moral reason you could argue its for), so even acknowledging it as a major talking point is helping the Cancel Mob attack him for no other benefit.
He isn't a leader, we aren't electing him, he shouldn't be anyone's hero (based on a long history), he is a hired goon by Trump to do a job and his personal life is irrelevant to that. Just like you and me.
No, I'm preaching that women shouldn't be believed if they limp in with weak shit, and they should be shamed if not punished for doing so with malicious intent regardless of the truth of the matter.
That is morally wrong to support, because its upholding an evil system that allows women to demand men give them a response on any claim they make and be given privileged positions in society on being inherently trustworthy status.
And because that evil tool is being used with political intent to stop something I voted to have happen (for Trump, who appointed Musk to do it), I will voice against it.