For what purpose? This only exists to tear him down by making him look bad, because he is pissing off powerful people with his DOGE stooges.
It has no other benefit, certainly not to the child's (the only moral reason you could argue its for), so even acknowledging it as a major talking point is helping the Cancel Mob attack him for no other benefit.
He isn't a leader, we aren't electing him, he shouldn't be anyone's hero (based on a long history), he is a hired goon by Trump to do a job and his personal life is irrelevant to that. Just like you and me.
No, I'm preaching that women shouldn't be believed if they limp in with weak shit, and they should be shamed if not punished for doing so with malicious intent regardless of the truth of the matter.
That is morally wrong to support, because its upholding an evil system that allows women to demand men give them a response on any claim they make and be given privileged positions in society on being inherently trustworthy status.
And because that evil tool is being used with political intent to stop something I voted to have happen (for Trump, who appointed Musk to do it), I will voice against it.
I never said don't say it, I said it has no benefit in response to you saying it did as an absolute and that she should be shunned for doing so without any care given to her claims.
Him being public changes nothing about the principle I am pointing out, it applies equally to all men. It only can change something if you are an obsessed celeb worshipper who considers all information about their lives relevant at all times.
For what purpose? This only exists to tear him down by making him look bad, because he is pissing off powerful people with his DOGE stooges.
It has no other benefit, certainly not to the child's (the only moral reason you could argue its for), so even acknowledging it as a major talking point is helping the Cancel Mob attack him for no other benefit.
He isn't a leader, we aren't electing him, he shouldn't be anyone's hero (based on a long history), he is a hired goon by Trump to do a job and his personal life is irrelevant to that. Just like you and me.
No, I'm preaching that women shouldn't be believed if they limp in with weak shit, and they should be shamed if not punished for doing so with malicious intent regardless of the truth of the matter.
That is morally wrong to support, because its upholding an evil system that allows women to demand men give them a response on any claim they make and be given privileged positions in society on being inherently trustworthy status.
And because that evil tool is being used with political intent to stop something I voted to have happen (for Trump, who appointed Musk to do it), I will voice against it.
I never said don't say it, I said it has no benefit in response to you saying it did as an absolute and that she should be shunned for doing so without any care given to her claims.
Him being public changes nothing about the principle I am pointing out, it applies equally to all men. It only can change something if you are an obsessed celeb worshipper who considers all information about their lives relevant at all times.