Except that I specifically used the word "can't" to refer to rule 16.
Rule 16 would only say that you 'may not'. You still can, if you could, which you can't. And of course you're not getting banned for providing evidence for your preposterous claims. We just both know that you CANNOT, you fucking retard.
I even had the same joke in my previous comment, and it flew right over your head.
So to be clear: you cannot distinguish between 'cannot' (not able to) and 'may not' (not allowed to), even though I clearly pointed to it, and you think it's other people who are the retards???
I mean, no wonder you're a Nazi. They're not know for being bright.
Rule 16 would only say that you 'may not'. You still can, if you could, which you can't. And of course you're not getting banned for providing evidence for your preposterous claims.
Tell that to everyone who has been banned for this very thing. Oh wait, you can't because they have been banned.
So to be clear: you cannot distinguish between 'cannot' (not able to) and 'may not' (not allowed to), even though I clearly pointed to it, and you think it's other people who are the retards???
You truly have a dizzying intellect. Your petty semantics are very convincing. I will surely fall for your trap and give you the ammunition needed to get me banned any minute now, because I won't be able to resist the urge to win an internet argument with a European faggot at any cost.
Tell that to everyone who has been banned for this very thing. Oh wait, you can't because they have been banned.
I'm not seeing examples.
You truly have a dizzying intellect
WAIT TILL I GET GOING! Wait, where was I?
I will surely fall for your trap and give you the ammunition needed to get me banned any minute now
You're paranoid. On the KiA2 subreddit, there was an informal rule that no one gets banned for responding to an inquiry. It's pretty rich to ask someone something to get him banned, don't you think?
Of course, if you're that paranoid, you can supply those vast amounts of evidence that you have in a PM. I'll post them, and you can report it to see if all your paranoia is justified.
We both know that this is just a case of you not having the goods.
Rule 16 would only say that you 'may not'. You still can, if you could, which you can't. And of course you're not getting banned for providing evidence for your preposterous claims. We just both know that you CANNOT, you fucking retard.
So to be clear: you cannot distinguish between 'cannot' (not able to) and 'may not' (not allowed to), even though I clearly pointed to it, and you think it's other people who are the retards???
I mean, no wonder you're a Nazi. They're not know for being bright.
Tell that to everyone who has been banned for this very thing. Oh wait, you can't because they have been banned.
You truly have a dizzying intellect. Your petty semantics are very convincing. I will surely fall for your trap and give you the ammunition needed to get me banned any minute now, because I won't be able to resist the urge to win an internet argument with a European faggot at any cost.
I'm not seeing examples.
WAIT TILL I GET GOING! Wait, where was I?
You're paranoid. On the KiA2 subreddit, there was an informal rule that no one gets banned for responding to an inquiry. It's pretty rich to ask someone something to get him banned, don't you think?
Of course, if you're that paranoid, you can supply those vast amounts of evidence that you have in a PM. I'll post them, and you can report it to see if all your paranoia is justified.
We both know that this is just a case of you not having the goods.