It's owned by a private company, not the Chinese government or a state-owned enterprise. Even if it did, I'd be more concerned about the US security state's endless illegal spying.
Is Donald Trump a Russian asset?
The same NatSec professionals who are anti-TikTok say yes.
Are we just not supposed to take action because it might be abused?
What I noticed is that the action is completely disproportionate to the claim. So if the app is spying on people, which is what they claim, why not ban that instead of specifically targeting one app? Perhaps because they want to use American apps to spy on users themselves.
It's owned by a private company, not the Chinese government or a state-owned enterprise. Even if it did, I'd be more concerned about the US security state's endless illegal spying.
The same NatSec professionals who are anti-TikTok say yes.
What I noticed is that the action is completely disproportionate to the claim. So if the app is spying on people, which is what they claim, why not ban that instead of specifically targeting one app? Perhaps because they want to use American apps to spy on users themselves.
Lol a private company. You mean a company controlled by the ccp that sends the data straight to the ccp
Like US tech companies send their data straight to the USG? And that is actually demonstrated, and not just asserted.