Foster Parents shot for fostering child
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
The fact that you keep using adoption in a story about fostering to try and make your position reveals how poorly thought out it is. These two things are not even close to the same and involve entirely different stories and processes.
Come back when you calm down enough to not make such basic fucking mistakes before you want to try and soapbox me, nigga.
The difference doesn't change the evil of your position. The victim is not guilty of their own murder by the crimes of the race of the child. You're four levels down in being unfathomably wrong:
It does, because it removes a crucial element of your statement.
A kid that age being given to foster care is almost certainly being seized from an extremely dangerous and bad home, likely due to an arrest or worse. This means the parent is an extremely risky person that you have now intertwined your family with. Its pure naivety to think they won't react to having their child "stole" in their mindset.
So yes, it completely undermines your point. But you've already moved to a new goalpost anyway.
Being a victim doesn't absolve you of all your actions that were taken that lead to you being victimized. In fact, its positions like yours that lead people into ignorance of the world that creates more victims. Someone doesn't cease to be a victim nor deserving of sympathy because they share some amount of blame for getting themselves into that situation. Its only if you live under Leftist mindsets and their extremities that you would think otherwise.
Including the learned helplessness Lefties love to teach us to prevent us from ever learning how to protect ourselves in this world by acknowledging "hey don't do X and you can reduce your risk of getting Y's."
But I guess its better to run around crying that "no woman deserves to be raped" when someone points out "don't get black out drunk with strangers though." Better to just never say that because someone might call us EVIL!
All this does is go right back to where we were in the beginning when I said: "Yeah they should have house-carried". Just in case mom comes around, you stay strapped. "Yes, the system is at fault for not keeping the mother in a cell". This undermines nothing I said, and repeats what I said earlier.
There was no debate on that. What you have done is back-pedal from saying that white people should assume this is the most likely outcome of having a black kid. That is the specific """Leftist mindset""" you were complaining about. But I'll accept that back-pedaling as a recognition that blaming the white foster parents for this crime because they tried to love a (very likely abused) child for the child's own benefit is an obvious evil.
If they are guilty of naivete, it is not from welcoming a black child into their home. Their naiveite was (probably) hoping that the mother would love her daughter enough not to be a dangerous felon and generalized schizo. Unfortunately, those are people who are also evil, and are present in all races.
Or, you don't open your door to begin with trying to have "good intentions" on the offchance that you are capable of repelling a violent threat.
Which was my entire original post, don't put your hand into the mud or else you might get pulled down into it (and everyone around you too). You took offense to the racial aspect and then demanded that was the only relevant bit to it, when that point can in fact be a-racial and still be completely valid as I said.
I ain't reading the rest of your post, pendejo, and will continue to pick and choose at my leisure since that's all you seem interested in doing after trying to put a dozen accusations and words in my mouth like a prissy bitch throughout the day.
Sorry to hold you to your own standard, as I'm sure you'll consider that <debate club nonsense> meaning you win. Because all you seem to be interested in, winning philosophical jerkoffs.