So it's settled!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Meanwhile, Stable Diffusion be like..
Yes, but you need a good model.
Even the bad models are often better than the mainstream options.
Not really, some paid models are amazing (midjourney, dall-e 3, luma photon flash) but standard SD is severely lacking. There are some pretty good SD models like Flux and 3.5 Large but they are still worse than the paid ones I mentioned. Which is a shame because midjourney and Dall-E 3 are censored as fuck.
Not to mention, local models obviously require a good GPU, more time, etc.
That being said if you are not bummed out by how time consuming and complicated it is to set up SD, there are some really good models in civitai.com, especially if you want cute girls.
Pixai is can be good too if you use a lora
I dunno, I tried running whatever came bundled with Easy Diffusion a while back and it was pretty fucking sketch.
That looks a lot more like Pony than just random ol' Stable Diffusion, to me.
Illustrious, actually
That makes sense, too. It's kind of just an improved version in a lot of use-cases.
Wow the Meta AI reeeeeaaaallly got lost there. Ended up with a fairy creature or something, the mushrooms are just out of left field entirely.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The only people who have to worry about AI taking their jobs are the mediocre commission scribblers on the internet. And even then most of them are safe because they can actually, well, read. Presumably.
I think meta did the best. It has wings, pronounced horns, and looks creepy. The other ai just drew white women in red bikinis in dark settings with some hair clips.
It did the best overall job, but it also added a lot of unasked for parameters and details to the point where its entirely themed around them. If not for the Horns it would literally just be a dark fairy in every possible way.
That's not inherently the worst thing that will ruin something everytime, but its also a huge mark against it in a completely different way.
I appreciate how every one of them is awful in its own unique way while still at least vaguely reaching the request.
It would have been more fun, if the ChatGTP generated it as ASCII art in order to comply with the request, haha
Unfortunately, we are past the age of censorship being fun at least. Now its gotta be bland and standoffish.
I fucking despise AI art. It looks so soulless. It's little more than a cheap imitation. A McDonald's cheese burger of the art world. I'm not even an artist. There's just something primal in me that screams internally that what I am looking at isn't to be trusted.
I admit, Grok passes the smell check a lot better, but that leaves me even more uneasy.
Grok: generated elvish looking demon things and what looks like a possessed human woman
MetaAI: closest result but it looks like a demonic fairy
ChatGPT: failed to generate due to woke filters
https://cdn.gab.ai/tools/gabby/outputs/65decc8d3c0930cbfc57c91b/3dd6bde2-823d-4895-9a05-3f59b43dc6de.png
...well then...
That's silly.
Never used ScatGPT. Not interested in MetaAI. Grok is not yet available inside the EU (you can imagine). I've been able to create really good semi-NSFW with Image 3. You just have to know what to write to avoid the censorship catching on.
When you have more time, use Flux. It's open-source and generates very realistic images.
Catgirl In a swimsuit: https://meta.ai/s/8AyKXuU2hDKBD1oj/
Well, 1 out of 4 ain't bad! 🧐
For the furry lover (regenerated the lower left image & got this!) https://meta.ai/s/PjSTsiwJXPECWAW7/
SFW of course.
Draw a nekomimi wearing a bikini: https://meta.ai/s/dH38QAN1pez6ETPz/
3 out of 4 is pretty good!
Damn these results are amazing. Particularly bottom left.
What exactly is settled?
That ChatGPT is so censored even other more mainstream AI models are better
A picture can be misinterpreted a thousand ways. Words only mean what they say.
And these words only tell me to misinterpret the pictures.
Why not just say that in your title?
Because it is obvious for the vast majority of people.
Right. Because it didn't draw cartoon boobs for you, it's obviously censorship. Where as the images of dark haired, tan woman being called succubi, along with a red headed woman being a demon means nothing, despite that being what's actually shown.
Here allow me to rewrite your title for you again.
I think you should go back to Reddit and stay there, shithead.
You couldn't even interpret the basic title I made. You could just admit you were triggered over seeing women in bikinis. You belong on Reddit because that is where the pseudo-puritans who masturbate to furry vore porn try to lecture others over what should and should not be allowed.
Comment Reported for Rule 5 - Pornography
Comment Removed for: Rule 5 - Pornography
the same sort of people who made chatgpt spearheaded the pornography industry where you can find any number of women wearing fake demon ears and demon tail butt plugs. are you sure you're not on their side all along if fetish pornography is all you want in life?
You are one of those who think he is much smarter than he really is. Also, if you think a bikini is "pornography", I hope you never go to a beach in your life.
irrelevant quote, 0 refutal. come on, man...
Posted about the quote, ignored the rest of the post.