"Texas will turn blue" was predicted in 2016 and 2020, and continues to be the prediction going forward under the assumption that Hispanics will never be anything but a captured Democratic supermajority and it is absolutely false. I literally watched The Red Elephants be dead wrong on this subject as he predicted voting outcomes entirely by ethnic demography. If you keep pushing only for ethnic conflict, you'll continue to fail. The whole point about Trump being able to win in 2024 is specifically because he talked about economics. Feminism had nothing to do with it. Once again, Trump had slim support among Catholics. Most Christians seem to have been so disgusted by Institutional Christianity (whether by Catholicism, Protestantism, Evangelism, etc), that they were fairly low turn-out in this last election, and also seem to have low support for their own religious institutions. However, there is a rise in the religiosity of Christians: indicating that there is a kind of spiritual rebellion against the churches taking place.
And winning more of hispanic and black votes has gone well for Trump, better than basically anyone else so far. This is because Trump literally is scraping the bottom of the barrel for white votes. It really is why he lost in 2020: he basically had a small loss among Union Dems, elderly whites, and Sweedes. His worst white demographic is among people who ethnically identify as English. The demographic with his strongest support self-identifies as ethnically American.
That is actually the real ethnic discussion that no one is having. How do you create a larger American ethnic group.
“It was the economy!”. No it was the Kamala They/Them ad they ran ad nauseam which garnered the male vote. The voting outcome of Hispanics is they voted majority dem by 8 points, the best turnout republicans ever had with Hispanics was a loss of 8 points. Based on demographics trends Texas will in fact turn blue, the only modifier is time. Also the catholic bs from you is adorable considering the only reason Trump didn’t win Catholics by a landslide was HISPANIC CATHOLICS who voted 31 points for Kamala while White Catholics voted 23 points for Trump.
No it was the Kamala They/Them ad they ran ad nauseam which garnered the male vote.
No one noticed that ad unless they were terminally online like the rest of us. It was a non-sequetr. I didn't see the breakdown of a catholics by ethnicity. Also, part of a problem there is that you said white v hispanic, the feds only recognize white as a race, and hispanic as an ethnicity, so we'd end up with the white hispanic problem again.
That was the most played ad by the Trump campaign on every sports event leading up to the election. If you think no one noticed an ad played 30k times in the swing states you’re dead wrong. The feds also claim Arabs are white yet no one has an issue differentiating them.
"Texas will turn blue" was predicted in 2016 and 2020, and continues to be the prediction going forward under the assumption that Hispanics will never be anything but a captured Democratic supermajority and it is absolutely false. I literally watched The Red Elephants be dead wrong on this subject as he predicted voting outcomes entirely by ethnic demography. If you keep pushing only for ethnic conflict, you'll continue to fail. The whole point about Trump being able to win in 2024 is specifically because he talked about economics. Feminism had nothing to do with it. Once again, Trump had slim support among Catholics. Most Christians seem to have been so disgusted by Institutional Christianity (whether by Catholicism, Protestantism, Evangelism, etc), that they were fairly low turn-out in this last election, and also seem to have low support for their own religious institutions. However, there is a rise in the religiosity of Christians: indicating that there is a kind of spiritual rebellion against the churches taking place.
And winning more of hispanic and black votes has gone well for Trump, better than basically anyone else so far. This is because Trump literally is scraping the bottom of the barrel for white votes. It really is why he lost in 2020: he basically had a small loss among Union Dems, elderly whites, and Sweedes. His worst white demographic is among people who ethnically identify as English. The demographic with his strongest support self-identifies as ethnically American.
That is actually the real ethnic discussion that no one is having. How do you create a larger American ethnic group.
“It was the economy!”. No it was the Kamala They/Them ad they ran ad nauseam which garnered the male vote. The voting outcome of Hispanics is they voted majority dem by 8 points, the best turnout republicans ever had with Hispanics was a loss of 8 points. Based on demographics trends Texas will in fact turn blue, the only modifier is time. Also the catholic bs from you is adorable considering the only reason Trump didn’t win Catholics by a landslide was HISPANIC CATHOLICS who voted 31 points for Kamala while White Catholics voted 23 points for Trump.
No one noticed that ad unless they were terminally online like the rest of us. It was a non-sequetr. I didn't see the breakdown of a catholics by ethnicity. Also, part of a problem there is that you said white v hispanic, the feds only recognize white as a race, and hispanic as an ethnicity, so we'd end up with the white hispanic problem again.
That was the most played ad by the Trump campaign on every sports event leading up to the election. If you think no one noticed an ad played 30k times in the swing states you’re dead wrong. The feds also claim Arabs are white yet no one has an issue differentiating them.
How the feds set up ethnicity is dumb, but it's how polling is done a lot of the time. Hell, normally it's just "Hispanic" or "Other: ____"
I don't think many offline people saw it. I met other heavily online people (who weren't political) that also never saw it.