I used to be "tolerant" of it but it became abundantly clear years ago that they can't keep it to themselves. That's why I have very low level of tolerance for alot of things at this point
I think that there are a majority of people who are homosexual and are happy to celebrate it within their own communities - I'm down with that.
I think some would like to see acceptance, equal to the normal heterosexual variety, within society - I'm down with that too but understand that there will be incompatibility issues with that.
Then there's the mindvirus.
When those with nothing but hate in their hearts used the LGB community as a shield to collectively try and tear society apart for no discernible reason we ended up with a community of otherwise loving people just looking for recognition turned into battered wives and everyone who was normally tolerant of it unable to say anything because apparently it would be an attack on an already battered wife.
I'd like to say there is space in my heart to try and help that situation but the mindvirus has already spread to more foundational elements of the society that allowed for the tolerance of such thing since viral entry.
Without a steady foundational framework to allow for such things the entire concept of individuality is smashed.
Considering how fucking bad most of the arguments in support of the Gays was, I will absolutely hate on the people who both fell for and argued that shit.
You don't get to just go "oops my bad, I didn't think about this at all while I was screaming hate in your face" years later when the consequences come home to roost in the obvious manner everyone you were fighting said they would.
Its almost more pathetic how many people try to leave their sinking ship and suck up to the side they used to try to shank, and then act like their principles or opinion should ever be worth something again.
Considering how fucking bad most of the arguments in support of the Gays was, I will absolutely hate on the people who both fell for and argued that shit.
Well said. It means these people were pliable enough to be convinced to support a trend that works against their own best/future interests. And if they fell for it once, they will fall for it again -- it just has to be under the right circumstances.
Unfortunately KIA, and most of our side in this "culture war," is replete with Former Lefties so the consensus always has to be "poor thing, I'm so glad you are with us now." Funnily, its the same invasion tactics used by Lefties everywhere else, to prove how little changed they are.
And, much like Clott Adams, they get really mad if you don't just totally ignore them revealing their own lack of credibility or principles prior. You just are supposed to say "BASED" and clap along to them being on our side now and saying things we want to hear.
The problem, as I see it, is that those running society are attempting to "take over" the natural world and replace it with a curated, sanitized, version of reality written by themselves. Because of this, it becomes necessary for them to account for everything which exists in their falsified narrative. So now there is a contrived conflict being presented to the population, to attempt to force people to choose between either accepting every perverse notion under the sun as an open part of society, or to wield the technological powers being created to dictate everyone's lives to an extreme degree. The common thread running through it all being the technocrats/false gods asserting that they WILL take over, and as long as people continue to follow their narratives their plan progresses.
The ability for us to communicate our thoughts at all (Or even form them) all comes from taxes being noted. This goes all the way back to why writing exists and why any credence is given to societal leadership. It always, eventually, falls into some sort of worship.
These people, I'd like to think unknowingly, demand attention and to be worshipped as if their are divine and beyond the reputes of mankind.
This is, of course, not the situation. However pointing that out gets anyone the Galileo treatment and so most remain schtum.
I'm not a fan of evil versus good but this is certainly a decent reason to think about the long game as to what is beneficial to who and what we are.
Exactly. It's people who can't deal with a shifting, human, social reality and need everything to be handled in an academic or litigious manner. They can't hear something they don't like and go, "man, that guy is a dick," and move on. There has to be a rule or regulation they can use to eliminate the thing they don't like to curate their experience just like the way the algorithm does for their social media feed. The slightest anxiety means the system is failing.
Not everything needs to be codified. "Soft" pressures like did a fantastic job of self-regulating things. Moving away from that to an explicit, game-rules approach to society has been a disaster.
Moving away from that to an explicit, game-rules approach to society has been a disaster.
Well, if you want some idea of why they hate games so much: I was actually the best gamer in the world at one point, and they've been trying to recruit me to help them "gamify" life since them. But instead of buying in to their plans I've been spending my time calling them retarded in increasingly elaborate detail for even attempting such a thing.
I guess the world before now was built upon copying notable individuals. Yet rather than actually being successful at controlling the world as they imagined they had been, the world had routed it's way around their bullshit and found a way to persist in spite of it. Now that they're employing increasingly forceful technologies in an attempt to fix what they consider to be flaws in their plans, they are instead removing everything which used to be keeping them alive despite their insanity.
It's quite sad, and they're not going to stop, since they're already thousands of years invested in their scheming. Best make plans for how you're going to roll with the fall once it all comes to a head.
There has to be a rule or regulation they can use to eliminate the thing they don't like
The reason for this is that "power" has been more and more removed from the common man's hand, leading to him being unable to remove the thorns from his own palm. A simple example is that I can't just smack the shit out of the local loudmouth talking shit to shut him up like for most of human history, the government/law has removed my power to do so. So I am left with this thorn in my hand and am forced to instead petition the government to use the power it has taken from me to do so instead.
You can see this across so many corners of society. You can't fix your own machine, it has to be a Certified Tech. You can't sell food, you need FDA Approval. On and on.
So people have forgotten that they have the power to begin with, and instead remain paralyzed by the real consequences there can be to use it. Its why the CEO shooting last week was so wildly popular, because it resonated with everyone by subverting that feeling of helplessness.
6 years ago lol. The only time I've even seen anything about this woman was itsagundam making a video about buttfuckers getting mad that she said butt fucking is wrong. People change. I mean I personally wouldn't give her the benefit of the doubt yet. Too many snakes in the grass
My point is that she didn't change, she's an oportunist who hops on whatever wandagon helps her get rid of anything that would appeal to het-men, because it gets at odds with her grifter thot lifestyle. She's tradthot Alyssa Mercante.
I doubt she has real political opinions, most likely she just uses broad politics to obfuscate her real grift
I used to be pro LGB.
I still have nothing against the concept but that was the first one to get corrupted.
Don't hate on people for what they believed, question what it was that made them drop support for it.
I used to be "tolerant" of it but it became abundantly clear years ago that they can't keep it to themselves. That's why I have very low level of tolerance for alot of things at this point
I think that there are a majority of people who are homosexual and are happy to celebrate it within their own communities - I'm down with that.
I think some would like to see acceptance, equal to the normal heterosexual variety, within society - I'm down with that too but understand that there will be incompatibility issues with that.
Then there's the mindvirus.
When those with nothing but hate in their hearts used the LGB community as a shield to collectively try and tear society apart for no discernible reason we ended up with a community of otherwise loving people just looking for recognition turned into battered wives and everyone who was normally tolerant of it unable to say anything because apparently it would be an attack on an already battered wife.
I'd like to say there is space in my heart to try and help that situation but the mindvirus has already spread to more foundational elements of the society that allowed for the tolerance of such thing since viral entry.
Without a steady foundational framework to allow for such things the entire concept of individuality is smashed.
The quiet nice gays are the bugs, not the features.
Considering how fucking bad most of the arguments in support of the Gays was, I will absolutely hate on the people who both fell for and argued that shit.
You don't get to just go "oops my bad, I didn't think about this at all while I was screaming hate in your face" years later when the consequences come home to roost in the obvious manner everyone you were fighting said they would.
Its almost more pathetic how many people try to leave their sinking ship and suck up to the side they used to try to shank, and then act like their principles or opinion should ever be worth something again.
Well said. It means these people were pliable enough to be convinced to support a trend that works against their own best/future interests. And if they fell for it once, they will fall for it again -- it just has to be under the right circumstances.
Unfortunately KIA, and most of our side in this "culture war," is replete with Former Lefties so the consensus always has to be "poor thing, I'm so glad you are with us now." Funnily, its the same invasion tactics used by Lefties everywhere else, to prove how little changed they are.
And, much like Clott Adams, they get really mad if you don't just totally ignore them revealing their own lack of credibility or principles prior. You just are supposed to say "BASED" and clap along to them being on our side now and saying things we want to hear.
Even on here there's still plenty of left wing hold outs
Do you love your wife?
Let's say you couldn't.
Capiche?!?
So your entire basis was "look at this sad picture, let's throw away all laws and reason."
I'll grant you this, its a simple position that dodges most of the obvious problems by being literally too simplistic.
I'm a simple man :)
The problem, as I see it, is that those running society are attempting to "take over" the natural world and replace it with a curated, sanitized, version of reality written by themselves. Because of this, it becomes necessary for them to account for everything which exists in their falsified narrative. So now there is a contrived conflict being presented to the population, to attempt to force people to choose between either accepting every perverse notion under the sun as an open part of society, or to wield the technological powers being created to dictate everyone's lives to an extreme degree. The common thread running through it all being the technocrats/false gods asserting that they WILL take over, and as long as people continue to follow their narratives their plan progresses.
The ability for us to communicate our thoughts at all (Or even form them) all comes from taxes being noted. This goes all the way back to why writing exists and why any credence is given to societal leadership. It always, eventually, falls into some sort of worship.
These people, I'd like to think unknowingly, demand attention and to be worshipped as if their are divine and beyond the reputes of mankind.
This is, of course, not the situation. However pointing that out gets anyone the Galileo treatment and so most remain schtum.
I'm not a fan of evil versus good but this is certainly a decent reason to think about the long game as to what is beneficial to who and what we are.
Very interesting thought
Exactly. It's people who can't deal with a shifting, human, social reality and need everything to be handled in an academic or litigious manner. They can't hear something they don't like and go, "man, that guy is a dick," and move on. There has to be a rule or regulation they can use to eliminate the thing they don't like to curate their experience just like the way the algorithm does for their social media feed. The slightest anxiety means the system is failing.
Not everything needs to be codified. "Soft" pressures like did a fantastic job of self-regulating things. Moving away from that to an explicit, game-rules approach to society has been a disaster.
Well, if you want some idea of why they hate games so much: I was actually the best gamer in the world at one point, and they've been trying to recruit me to help them "gamify" life since them. But instead of buying in to their plans I've been spending my time calling them retarded in increasingly elaborate detail for even attempting such a thing.
I guess the world before now was built upon copying notable individuals. Yet rather than actually being successful at controlling the world as they imagined they had been, the world had routed it's way around their bullshit and found a way to persist in spite of it. Now that they're employing increasingly forceful technologies in an attempt to fix what they consider to be flaws in their plans, they are instead removing everything which used to be keeping them alive despite their insanity.
It's quite sad, and they're not going to stop, since they're already thousands of years invested in their scheming. Best make plans for how you're going to roll with the fall once it all comes to a head.
The reason for this is that "power" has been more and more removed from the common man's hand, leading to him being unable to remove the thorns from his own palm. A simple example is that I can't just smack the shit out of the local loudmouth talking shit to shut him up like for most of human history, the government/law has removed my power to do so. So I am left with this thorn in my hand and am forced to instead petition the government to use the power it has taken from me to do so instead.
You can see this across so many corners of society. You can't fix your own machine, it has to be a Certified Tech. You can't sell food, you need FDA Approval. On and on.
So people have forgotten that they have the power to begin with, and instead remain paralyzed by the real consequences there can be to use it. Its why the CEO shooting last week was so wildly popular, because it resonated with everyone by subverting that feeling of helplessness.
Read the subtext tho: A thot thinks two men buttfucking is a-ok, but gets mad when a female character appeals to straight men. Why would that be? 🤔
6 years ago lol. The only time I've even seen anything about this woman was itsagundam making a video about buttfuckers getting mad that she said butt fucking is wrong. People change. I mean I personally wouldn't give her the benefit of the doubt yet. Too many snakes in the grass
My point is that she didn't change, she's an oportunist who hops on whatever wandagon helps her get rid of anything that would appeal to het-men, because it gets at odds with her grifter thot lifestyle. She's tradthot Alyssa Mercante.
I doubt she has real political opinions, most likely she just uses broad politics to obfuscate her real grift