Yes that is what the "legislative fix" is and I am against any amnesty.
Trump floated this same idea back in his first term and it didn't go anywhere because the Dems refused to make a deal with him to prevent Trump from getting credit on solving this issue.
I hope the Dems are petty and they just stonewall him on this DACA shit again.
We need to deport ALL of these illegals not give any of them amnesty.
Yep. The problem with Trump's proposals is that the system doesn't need an official amnesty to keep the DACA caca here. They've been doing it this long without one. He needs a different bartering chip like stonewalling their foreign policy goals or jailing the corrupt faggots.
Dems refused to make a deal with him to prevent Trump from getting credit on solving this issue.
"Solving the issue."
Dems are so obsessed they won't even let someone else do amnesty. "Only we're allowed to do that." I guess we should be grateful, in this instance.
I wouldn't be as opposed to amnesty...if we hadn't already done it. It has to be one-and-done, or it just encourages more illegal crossings; it's an incentive. If we were going to do amnesty, it needed to come with cutting all benefits, and securing the border. It has to come with a fix to the issue of crossings, not just a "fix" to that we have people here who shouldn't be. Considering we already did it without fixing anything, we can't do it again.
Legislative fix could mean they have to participate in the legal immigration system from scratch the same as anybody else - meaning lots of time, money, scrutiny, and they've never committed J-walking level crimes.
They're known to immigration so I think that precludes them getting a travel visa here for at least 5 years, and maybe not ever being citizens.
So I think 'legislative fix' could mean something like they go back to their home country but can apply right away and do it legally. Which would also provide a reason for Congress to reform immigration so it's faster and results in better immigrants.
Yes that is what the "legislative fix" is and I am against any amnesty.
Trump floated this same idea back in his first term and it didn't go anywhere because the Dems refused to make a deal with him to prevent Trump from getting credit on solving this issue.
I hope the Dems are petty and they just stonewall him on this DACA shit again.
We need to deport ALL of these illegals not give any of them amnesty.
Yep. The problem with Trump's proposals is that the system doesn't need an official amnesty to keep the DACA caca here. They've been doing it this long without one. He needs a different bartering chip like stonewalling their foreign policy goals or jailing the corrupt faggots.
"Solving the issue."
Dems are so obsessed they won't even let someone else do amnesty. "Only we're allowed to do that." I guess we should be grateful, in this instance.
I wouldn't be as opposed to amnesty...if we hadn't already done it. It has to be one-and-done, or it just encourages more illegal crossings; it's an incentive. If we were going to do amnesty, it needed to come with cutting all benefits, and securing the border. It has to come with a fix to the issue of crossings, not just a "fix" to that we have people here who shouldn't be. Considering we already did it without fixing anything, we can't do it again.
DACA amnesty has no value to Dems as a bargaining chip. That's why they won't grant concessions for it.
Legislative fix could mean they have to participate in the legal immigration system from scratch the same as anybody else - meaning lots of time, money, scrutiny, and they've never committed J-walking level crimes.
They're known to immigration so I think that precludes them getting a travel visa here for at least 5 years, and maybe not ever being citizens.
So I think 'legislative fix' could mean something like they go back to their home country but can apply right away and do it legally. Which would also provide a reason for Congress to reform immigration so it's faster and results in better immigrants.
That's my hope anyway.