Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

56
How are Trumps picks this time around?
posted 1 year ago by BlightBane 1 year ago by BlightBane +56 / -0

As an europoor I have limited insight into how good the announced people are, so I would appreciate some opinions. I know Gaetz, he seems like a good pick for just about anything. Tom Homan sounds based, so that also looks good. What do you guys think about the picks so far?

41 comments share
41 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
▲ 16 ▼
– Gizortnik 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

The picks he's got are very good so far. Vast majority look like they have a personal grievance with the government branch they are in charge of. So long as each are staying in their lane, they are going to do severe damage to the Deep State as they get in.

Gaetz is a particularly aggressive pick because the a DOJ employee, working with a US Naval officer, attempted to blackmail his father in donating to a fake rescue operation in an illegal manner. If Gaetz's father didn't donate money to the scam, the DOJ official would release a public smear that they were investigating him for a sex trafficking operation. This way, if Gaetz's father donated the money, they'd put him in jail to pressure Gaetz. If Gaetz's father didn't donate the money, they'd put out the smear investigation into the media.

Matt realized the con, and basically confronted the blackmailer's personally, and demanded the DOJ release information about their investigation on Tucker's show on Fox. In response, the DOJ official lied that none of that had ever happened (despite Gaetz recording the encounter), and then released the info on the investigation. The investigation claimed that Matt Gaetz sex trafficked a minor by consensually sleeping with a 17 year old intern while crossing state lines on his private plane. The 17 year old intern explicitly denied the allegation and said that she was on the plane with all the other staffers, and was not being trafficked. This, by the way, is what the "ethics investigation" is.

Putting Gaetz in charge of the DOJ means everyone involved in this blackmail operation is going to do federal prison time because they attacked him and his family personally.

That should really tell you how aggressive these picks are.

Edit -

Oh, it just got better. The news media just leaked the contents of the ethics investigation from "a hacker". Weird how this hacker isn't a Russian spy like Wikileaks apparently was, but whatever.

You see, I was under the impression that the DOJ's initial investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old" was the House ethics investigation into the DOJ's investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old"... _BUT APPARENTLY THOSE ARE DIFFERENT.

So, the initial "sex trafficking a 17 year old" charge must have been dropped, but then, for some unknowable reason, the DOJ started investigating the exact same charge for completely different circumstances. Instead of allegedly having consensual sex on a plane while crossing state lines with a 17 year old who denies the charges; there was apparently another 17 year old that Gaetz allegedly had sex with at Epstien/Diddy like parties that allegedly he set up. This is obvious projection.

The DOJ failed to blackmail his father to use as a weapon against him, and as a result they made up the charge of "Sex Trafficking" and have been spending several years desperately trying to create the conditions for that charge to exist.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

he investigation claimed that Matt Gaetz sex trafficked a minor by consensually sleeping with a 17 year old intern while crossing state lines on his private plane. The 17 year old intern explicitly denied the allegation and said that she was on the plane with all the other staffers, and was not being trafficked.

Rodgering a 17 year old did seem like the deep state was laying it on pretty thick.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Only in America would shit like that stick. In the civilized world the collective response would be "and?”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They were just projecting. But yeah, that's the basis of an ethics investigation by the House. It was an extension of the DOJ's attempt at blackmail. Which, by the way, is what they wanted because they never wanted the investigation to come to a conclusion so it could be used as a weapon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Ok, I have been wondering what the heck anyone has been talking about when they bring up Gaetz. Most of my lefty friends are getting drunk and saying it's a terrible mess and Trump is Hitler. I guess this means they're backing off.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Gizortnik 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

No, they're doubling down because a Gaetz DOJ appointment is going to lead to multiple convictions.

Oh, it just got better. The news media just leaked the contents of the ethics investigation from "a hacker". Weird how this hacker isn't a Russian spy like Wikileaks apparently was, but whatever.

You see, I was under the impression that the DOJ's initial investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old" was the House ethics investigation into the DOJ's investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old"... _BUT APPARENTLY THOSE ARE DIFFERENT.

So, the initial "sex trafficking a 17 year old" charge must have been dropped, but then, for some unknowable reason, the DOJ started investigating the exact same charge for completely different circumstances. Instead of allegedly having consensual sex on a plane while crossing state lines with a 17 year old who denies the charges; there was apparently another 17 year old that Gaetz allegedly had sex with at Epstien/Diddy like parties that allegedly he set up. This is obvious projection.

The DOJ failed to blackmail his father to use as a weapon against him, and as a result they made up the charge of "Sex Trafficking" and have been spending several years desperately trying to create the conditions for that charge to exist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy