Shared by lefty friends about the peace they want
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (100)
sorted by:
They are not used that way in physics. For example, the Twin "Paradox" and the Ultraviolet Catastrophe are "paradoxes" but really they just mean the theory was flawed and needed refining.
I'll be sure to check out those articles, but I was referring to your first comment in regards to the paradox of tolerance, which is political philosophy.
Why should that be any different? Everyone knows that philosophers are fartsniffing faggots, why should their treatment of paradoxes be considered valid?
Lol yeah, philosophers are fart-sniffing faggots, but thinking that the paradoxes they come up with disprove anything would imply that their ideas were ever provable in the first place. Their "paradoxes" are more like literary devices. Their ideas don't have objective value; people just like to quote them for their eloquence.