I think the biggest problem with urinalists is that too often more emphasis is placed on attacking the news outlet itself. People get mad at the Washington Compost, CBC, CNN, Kotaku, etc. but outside a few higher profile people most names fly under the radar. Since the whole industry is incestuous the roaches just move around constantly unchecked. What is it they say about making enemies uncomfortable? This is not some glow post saying people should commit violence but those journalists act the way they do because they feel safe. They would gladly print any of our personal information to try to get us fired and destroy our lives for wrongthink. Same should apply to them.
Targeted campaigns against the individual actors themselves, who think they're safe behind the flimsy veils of the corporate rags they represent... I like it.
That's because the 'Council of Europe' keeps issuing reports on the role of the media with regards to immigration. Urging them to not constantly put a spotlight on crimes committed by immigrants and Muslims, due to the fear of stoking 'xenophobia' and 'Islamophobia'.
Here is an example, but there is a lot more and goes back decades.
That's why they keep lying to you by omission. They want to stop the European from 'reverting' back to his 'original state' as a 'Nazi'. :')
And the media gets hysterical when they are called the enemy of the people. I remember a guy on an English news program asking a BBC representative why they don’t represent the views of the English people.
The UK is next door and has let the mass, systemic, institutionally supported rape of children for 30 years. The Irish better wake up to the rape culture that their government is importing and directing at their children.
In the first few seconds of the video she says she agrees with the 200 immigrants being dumped in their small town just not all in the one place. What a joke, she absolutely deserves the consequences of that. Or possibly she's saying that to try and avoid being called racist.
Or possibly she's saying that to try and avoid being called racist.
That. And that their media is lying to them about the scale of the problem. If you're a person who's trusted the media your whole life to paint your worldview, how are you supposed to have an accurate opinion on an issue like third world migration when they deliberately hide the truth about their crime & worthlessness.
Sidenote -- and this is just my opinion -- the words "mainstream" and "legacy" generally have positive connotations. "Corporate" media would be more appropriate. A lot of upstart independent media is mainstream now. It'll be awhile before we can reclaim legacy, but the leftist outlets that would call themselves that don't deserve to.
But their food is so YUMMY! MMMMMMMMM!
I think the biggest problem with urinalists is that too often more emphasis is placed on attacking the news outlet itself. People get mad at the Washington Compost, CBC, CNN, Kotaku, etc. but outside a few higher profile people most names fly under the radar. Since the whole industry is incestuous the roaches just move around constantly unchecked. What is it they say about making enemies uncomfortable? This is not some glow post saying people should commit violence but those journalists act the way they do because they feel safe. They would gladly print any of our personal information to try to get us fired and destroy our lives for wrongthink. Same should apply to them.
Make urinalists unemployed again.
Targeted campaigns against the individual actors themselves, who think they're safe behind the flimsy veils of the corporate rags they represent... I like it.
This is literally one of the Rules for Radicals. Individuals hurt faster than organizations. The left has been doing this for 50 years.
Dexter spin off, but instead of serial killers he targets these types of journalists.
Might be cause at least in the US they get their orders from (((reuters))) and the AP.
That's because the 'Council of Europe' keeps issuing reports on the role of the media with regards to immigration. Urging them to not constantly put a spotlight on crimes committed by immigrants and Muslims, due to the fear of stoking 'xenophobia' and 'Islamophobia'.
Here is an example, but there is a lot more and goes back decades.
That's why they keep lying to you by omission. They want to stop the European from 'reverting' back to his 'original state' as a 'Nazi'. :')
And the media gets hysterical when they are called the enemy of the people. I remember a guy on an English news program asking a BBC representative why they don’t represent the views of the English people.
The UK is next door and has let the mass, systemic, institutionally supported rape of children for 30 years. The Irish better wake up to the rape culture that their government is importing and directing at their children.
In the first few seconds of the video she says she agrees with the 200 immigrants being dumped in their small town just not all in the one place. What a joke, she absolutely deserves the consequences of that. Or possibly she's saying that to try and avoid being called racist.
That. And that their media is lying to them about the scale of the problem. If you're a person who's trusted the media your whole life to paint your worldview, how are you supposed to have an accurate opinion on an issue like third world migration when they deliberately hide the truth about their crime & worthlessness.
Sidenote -- and this is just my opinion -- the words "mainstream" and "legacy" generally have positive connotations. "Corporate" media would be more appropriate. A lot of upstart independent media is mainstream now. It'll be awhile before we can reclaim legacy, but the leftist outlets that would call themselves that don't deserve to.
The legacy media is complicit