Cool, so you changed your argument when you were shown to be wrong.
No. I'm not wrong. You interpret his statements in a way that fit your view. I take him by his words and judge him by his actions and his actions are that he never takes an anti-immigration stance only anti-Islam.
First video he praises Indians as a shining example of good immigration. They're not. Indians are still Indians in England. They're not English. He then advocates for flooding your country with Indians and even though it is partially in a joking manner considering he's still and never has taken the stance of being ethno nationalistic like Israel whose fate he is seemingly more concerned about than Englands.
Second video he says he unequivocally says he isn't anti-immigration. He never was. He says he would take in every Saudi woman if he could and it's not a joke considering he just said he isn't anti-immigration.
This shit is pretty clear. So unless you can prove me wrong by a statement of his, which should be pretty easy if he actually takes an anti-immigration stance, I'm not wrong.
You've taken the normie position of "immigrants aren't inherently bad, immigrants can integrate" and changed it to: "mass migration and demographic replacement is a perfect good".
He then advocates for flooding your country with Indians and even though it is partially in a joking manner
No, that's a lie. He's saying that Indians have integrated into the country. You made up the part where he seriously demands anglo eradication because you're a disingenuous hack and you see him as a race traitor.
never has taken the stance of being ethno nationalistic
Yes, he's not an ethno-nationalist and never said he was. Again you are claiming that someone with literal normie views on immigration (that you would find in a Trump rally) isn't an ethno-nationalist, and is therefore pro-white-genocide. But, that's wrong and you're intentionally mis-framing the argument like an idiot because you see him as a race traitor.
So unless you can prove me wrong by a statement of his
I don't need to give you a statement, your evidence is an invention from your own head, and not based on the quotes you are providing. It's no different from asking me to prove that Donald Trump is a racist because you heard him say that Neo-Nazis were very fine people. You making up shit is not evidence. Your position is unfounded, because you see him as a race traitor.
No, that's a lie. He's saying that Indians have integrated into the country.
Yeah. And he tells Angela Merkel she should invite masses of Indians. Besides integration isn't enough. You need to assimilate.
You made up the part where he seriously demands anglo eradication because you're a disingenuous hack and you see him as a race traitor.
I've never made the claim that he openly demands it. Angela Merkel also didn't openly said she wants Europeans to be ethnically replaced. But if you look at what she did it paints a pretty clear picture.
Again you are claiming that someone with literal normie views on immigration (that you would find in a Trump rally) isn't an ethno-nationalist, and is therefore pro-white-genocide.
The normie views on immigration are pro ethnic replacement whether you like it or not. Ethnic replacement did not begin with illegal mass migration. It began with legal migration. The US is the perfect example for that. Most normies are not aware of that but it doesn't change the outcome.
Yes, he's not an ethno-nationalist and never said he was.
I know. That's the point I'm making. He isn't even a tiny bit ethno-nationalist. At least not when it comes to England. When it comes to Israel it's a different matter.
Your position is unfounded, because you see him as a race traitor.
If I see him as a race traitor his words and actions won't matter. Good to know.
And he tells Angela Merkel she should invite masses of Indians.
Again, you're making up bald faced lies. He said Angela Merkel already opened the borders.
I've never made the claim that he openly demands it
Bald faced lie. It's how you started.
The normie views on immigration are pro ethnic replacement whether you like it or not.
Exactly, a bald faced lie. You know no one said that or intends it, so declare a middling normie position to be the same as advocating for genocide.
If I see him as a race traitor his words and actions won't matter.
Yes, absolutely. Nothing he does or says in the remainder of his life will ever matter. Even if he became an Ethno-Nationalist, it wouldn't matter because of the decision you already made.
Again, you're making up bald faced lies. He said Angela Merkel already opened the borders.
So? I didn't say that Tommy said she should open the borders so what's your point?
Bald faced lie. It's how you started.
I said he is openly pro mass immigration but not that he his pro ethnic replacement and backed it up with his own statements. Distinct difference.
Exactly, a bald faced lie. You know no one said that or intends it, so declare a middling normie position to be the same as advocating for genocide.
I literally explained that statement but it seems you chose to ignore it. At least answer to the whole argument I made instead of omitting most of it.
Yes, absolutely. Nothing he does or says in the remainder of his life will ever matter. Even if he became an Ethno-Nationalist, it wouldn't matter because of the decision you already made.
I literally asked you of an example of Tommy Robinson being generally anti-immigration and not just being anti-Islam and I would change my view on him. But you steadfastly refuse to provide me an example.
No. I'm not wrong. You interpret his statements in a way that fit your view. I take him by his words and judge him by his actions and his actions are that he never takes an anti-immigration stance only anti-Islam.
First video he praises Indians as a shining example of good immigration. They're not. Indians are still Indians in England. They're not English. He then advocates for flooding your country with Indians and even though it is partially in a joking manner considering he's still and never has taken the stance of being ethno nationalistic like Israel whose fate he is seemingly more concerned about than Englands.
Second video he says he unequivocally says he isn't anti-immigration. He never was. He says he would take in every Saudi woman if he could and it's not a joke considering he just said he isn't anti-immigration.
This shit is pretty clear. So unless you can prove me wrong by a statement of his, which should be pretty easy if he actually takes an anti-immigration stance, I'm not wrong.
You've taken the normie position of "immigrants aren't inherently bad, immigrants can integrate" and changed it to: "mass migration and demographic replacement is a perfect good".
No, that's a lie. He's saying that Indians have integrated into the country. You made up the part where he seriously demands anglo eradication because you're a disingenuous hack and you see him as a race traitor.
Yes, he's not an ethno-nationalist and never said he was. Again you are claiming that someone with literal normie views on immigration (that you would find in a Trump rally) isn't an ethno-nationalist, and is therefore pro-white-genocide. But, that's wrong and you're intentionally mis-framing the argument like an idiot because you see him as a race traitor.
I don't need to give you a statement, your evidence is an invention from your own head, and not based on the quotes you are providing. It's no different from asking me to prove that Donald Trump is a racist because you heard him say that Neo-Nazis were very fine people. You making up shit is not evidence. Your position is unfounded, because you see him as a race traitor.
Yeah. And he tells Angela Merkel she should invite masses of Indians. Besides integration isn't enough. You need to assimilate.
I've never made the claim that he openly demands it. Angela Merkel also didn't openly said she wants Europeans to be ethnically replaced. But if you look at what she did it paints a pretty clear picture.
The normie views on immigration are pro ethnic replacement whether you like it or not. Ethnic replacement did not begin with illegal mass migration. It began with legal migration. The US is the perfect example for that. Most normies are not aware of that but it doesn't change the outcome.
I know. That's the point I'm making. He isn't even a tiny bit ethno-nationalist. At least not when it comes to England. When it comes to Israel it's a different matter.
If I see him as a race traitor his words and actions won't matter. Good to know.
Again, you're making up bald faced lies. He said Angela Merkel already opened the borders.
Bald faced lie. It's how you started.
Exactly, a bald faced lie. You know no one said that or intends it, so declare a middling normie position to be the same as advocating for genocide.
Yes, absolutely. Nothing he does or says in the remainder of his life will ever matter. Even if he became an Ethno-Nationalist, it wouldn't matter because of the decision you already made.
So? I didn't say that Tommy said she should open the borders so what's your point?
I said he is openly pro mass immigration but not that he his pro ethnic replacement and backed it up with his own statements. Distinct difference.
I literally explained that statement but it seems you chose to ignore it. At least answer to the whole argument I made instead of omitting most of it.
I literally asked you of an example of Tommy Robinson being generally anti-immigration and not just being anti-Islam and I would change my view on him. But you steadfastly refuse to provide me an example.
So stop projecting by calling me bold faced liar.