While I do not and will not push my personal interest, I will also not allow this paper to stay on autopilot and fade into irrelevance — overtaken by unresearched podcasts and social media barbs — not without a fight.
Mock them all you want, but I'm better informed by ignoring WaPo and sifting through the rest than I would be solely reading WaPo. So what does that say about your "research"?
Yeah a lot of podcasters say a lot of stupid things. But someone could have followed Russell fucking Brand and read no other news and they would have been better informed about Covid than 95% of the population and 100% of WaPo readers.
WaPo is a deep state lapdog. They'll never come close to o objective journalism. Refusing to endorse a candidate is nothing. It's the least a newspaper can do. They're so biased they seem think it's something worthy of praise.
Mock them all you want, but I'm better informed by ignoring WaPo and sifting through the rest than I would be solely reading WaPo. So what does that say about your "research"?
Yeah a lot of podcasters say a lot of stupid things. But someone could have followed Russell fucking Brand and read no other news and they would have been better informed about Covid than 95% of the population and 100% of WaPo readers.
WaPo is a deep state lapdog. They'll never come close to o objective journalism. Refusing to endorse a candidate is nothing. It's the least a newspaper can do. They're so biased they seem think it's something worthy of praise.
He knows that. He owns it.