[Sinfest] Appalachia II
(sinfest.xyz)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
88% and 95% are basically guaranteed when you roll it, but 95% is still a bigger number and you'd probably pick those two if the option was presented. Which means that difference clearly means something
Alternatively, one is naturally evil and the other is tempted to be.
You seem to be really mad at the Church itself, and don't realize that its not comparable to the Viking rank and fodder's willingness to commit evil on their own.
Unless the Vikings were doing it for their Gods in which case the Christians were still the lesser evil because the Christian God is pretty clear in not doing that stuff that the corrupt Church was pushing, whereas the Viking ones tell them to straight up do most of it.
Sure. A more violent society that is capable of defending themselves is preferable to a society that slaves away for a corrupt clergy class while getting pillaged.
The Christian God is pretty clear in not doing that stuff? So basically only the Amish, Mennonites, Jehovas Witness and other pacifist variations of Christianity are real Christians? The Church despite being the very foundation of Christianity aren't real Christians? The first testament isn't real Christianity?
Let's not pretend that Christianity hasn't been extremely violent for most of its existence. Christianity, Islam and Judaism are all the same. Just tailored to different people.
So we went from 'they both rape and pillage but one is more honest' to "they are just capable of defending themselves unlike those losers lol" Again, just relabelling it over and over to be "thing I like good, thing I like bad."
A great example of someone whose point is based on emotion and working backwards from it.
I know this may be shocking to you. But the Church is made up of humans. Something that is known to be flawed, temptable and corruptable. Its actually a pretty important piece of that book they teach from, and them putting on the fancy hat or learning to read from the book doesn't suddenly make them perfect and the allure and temptations of power will be stronger than most men.
Also pacifism isn't a Christian tenant. Jesus pretty clearly says to always be armed even if you have to sell the clothes off your back. Thinking it is so reveals a pretty lackluster understanding of what it actually teaches.
You've moved the goalpost entirely from "The Vikings were better people in doing it" to now just wanting to say "Christianity has been super violent throughout history" which no one said otherwise. This is just a "Christians bad" spiel from 2000s reddit trying to pretend otherwise.
That tiny word "just" vastly changes the meaning. Good thing I never used it.
I agree. That is precisely the reason why I strongly dislike any and every monotheistic religion. The Bible wasn't written by God. It was written by humans. The Church isn't led by God it is led by humans.
I know. I was just nailing you on your argument that God is supposedly pretty clear on not doing "that stuff". If that is true that would mean Amish, Mennonites etc. would be the only ones following Gods words.
No. I said they were at least honest about it. I only brought up the violent nature of Christianity to point out the hypocrisy of Christianity.
Before you accuse me of being emotional you should stop putting words in my mouth.
Good thing what I said remains exactly the same if you excise it.
So we went from 'they both rape and pillage but one is more honest' to "they are capable of defending themselves unlike those losers lol" Again, just relabelling it over and over to be "thing I like good, thing I like bad."
Honestly, it was superfluous to begin with, likely a left over from a previous revision of the sentence.
It was a poor nail because the book is pretty clear on things that the Church did being sinful, no matter how they tried to spin it. Even if you say "the Church wrote the book not God" then its still pretty straight about a lot of basic concepts that they fail to uphold.
No, you posited that they were better for being honest about it. Which is where the disagreement all started, before you dropped it to continue to rant about Christianity bad as if this is enough to justify your argument on its own.