I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.
I expect an apology for Republicans and Rightists claiming that JD Vance wasn't a good choice. I told you that he is our guy and he's fucking showing it.
I think my way forward IRL with dedicated Trump-haters is to pivot to Vance, with this debate doing some service after cutting up out some sound bites.
He's reasonably young, well spoken, well articulated, and, well, not Trump.
Their brains are completely fused off by the constant barrage of anti-Trump rhetoric and lies. "Does this thing Vance say sound unreasonable?" "POTUS doesn't create law, Congress does. Wouldn't you want him as President of the Senate instead of that faggot Walz?"
Dunno if it'll work, but it's a last-ditch thing.
Vance is clearly aware of how to manage people's feelings, and definitely came across with a "I used to be like you once" attitude.
This is why I'll predict this debate moves the needle quite a bit toward the R.
Some will say they're worried about Trump's 'temperament', but reassured that Vance will take over after impeachment if Trump runs amok. Instead of the 'fear factor' VP to ward off impeachment he's picked a guy that brings in new voters rooting for impeachment.
And others will say here's this obviously nice, smart, decent guy who's vouching for Trump and they'll say, well, if that guy can get behind Trump then I can too. RFK and Tulsi have that as well, but they've already been character assassinated by the media whereas that's been more difficult to do with Vance and especially after this debate.
They’ve spent so much time, money, and energy demonizing Trump as Hitler 2.0 that it will actually be difficult to transfer that baggage onto the next big conservative leader.
It will be difficult, but they will still try. The left can't win on the issues, so control through fear is the only arrow they have in the quiver.
They did it for every single righty since WW2 except Eisenhower, and only because calling the general who fought the Nazis a Nazi is too retarded for normies to absorb.
It'll continue until Hitler fades to myth and the magic spell no longer works on the younger generations.