This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
I am sure I could go to the Congo or Afghanistan and find plenty of good people to break bread with, but all I would need to do is run into one or two people who hate me on sight with an itchy trigger finger and it would be game over.
And there are plenty of those running around, believe me.
There is not a fine line between brave and stupid in these cases. Every white idiot who ends up dead or raped in these third world shitholes got exactly what they deserved -- because you know none of them are taking the proper security measures.
99% of Whites have no idea of how powerful ethnic and tribal bonds are. They've never been exposed to it, it's never talked about, they can't even conceive it.
yeah we are breaking our own family bonds - even the core family of parents & children - and assume that other cultures where family ties are far more extense act & think the same.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
You know you're lying and I've brought it up several times before. Hell, I've brought up Haiti here more than anyone, and I've called it a white genocide. You're a disingenuous shit.
Murdering every white and then every mixed person on their half of the island doesn't constitute as blood lust? And yes mass executions during the French Revolution were also motivated by blood lust. Not sure where you got the idea that they weren't.
The mass executions were not motivated by blood lust, they were motivated by Rousseau. It is moral to compel the population by any means necessary to achieve acquiescence to "The General Will".
So you're saying that the population didn't (willingly) go along with the executions but Rousseau forcing them in order to terrorize the population into bending to "The General Will"?
If not how exactly did Rousseau manage to compel to population to go along with the mass executions? It's not really logical for a mob not to be bloodthirsty while cheering on executions.
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.
This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
Because these feuds go beyond individuals.
I am sure I could go to the Congo or Afghanistan and find plenty of good people to break bread with, but all I would need to do is run into one or two people who hate me on sight with an itchy trigger finger and it would be game over.
And there are plenty of those running around, believe me.
There is not a fine line between brave and stupid in these cases. Every white idiot who ends up dead or raped in these third world shitholes got exactly what they deserved -- because you know none of them are taking the proper security measures.
99% of Whites have no idea of how powerful ethnic and tribal bonds are. They've never been exposed to it, it's never talked about, they can't even conceive it.
yeah we are breaking our own family bonds - even the core family of parents & children - and assume that other cultures where family ties are far more extense act & think the same.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
Blah blah blah.
Edit: For everyone else's benefit. Jean-Jacques Dessalines, leader of the revolution and first leader of independent Haiti.
You can fuck right off, you faggot.
He's always trying to downplay anti-White racial hatred.
You know you're lying and I've brought it up several times before. Hell, I've brought up Haiti here more than anyone, and I've called it a white genocide. You're a disingenuous shit.
Now, has that sentiment ever been held by any other Leftist in history towards the bourgouise, faggot?
You're pathetic.
Murdering every white and then every mixed person on their half of the island doesn't constitute as blood lust? And yes mass executions during the French Revolution were also motivated by blood lust. Not sure where you got the idea that they weren't.
The mass executions were not motivated by blood lust, they were motivated by Rousseau. It is moral to compel the population by any means necessary to achieve acquiescence to "The General Will".
So you're saying that the population didn't (willingly) go along with the executions but Rousseau forcing them in order to terrorize the population into bending to "The General Will"?
If not how exactly did Rousseau manage to compel to population to go along with the mass executions? It's not really logical for a mob not to be bloodthirsty while cheering on executions.
You’re the dumbass who said that when they killed the white women’s families and forced them to marry blacks, it wasn’t sex slavery because the women were married. I don’t feel inclined to listen to you about the racial politics of anything.
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.