Mainly thinking about this because of some of the comments in this post here, but I do think while what we currently have right now is way too much regulation.
Some examples of 'good regulation' in my opinion would be the existence of drivers' licenses, 'right to repair' laws, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and building codes.
While some notable 'bad regulation' is anything to do with 2A restrictions and the modern health care industry.
Overall, I'm just trying to gauge what is good vs bad regulation.
Do you not know well-known proverbs? Regardless, even something that is not poison, like olive oil, can kill you if you consume enough of it.
Do you not know highschool chemistry?
Do... you even read your own posts or just downvote his automatically? That is a restatement of the same concept and you just lash out automatically
My original statement clearly wasn't sarcastic enough, although I thought my following posts made it clear. Whoosh nonetheless I suppose, can't really convey tone on the internet.
This is a spin on the "how many poison M&Ms would you eat?" meme, although that was posited about immigration.
Because liberals answer the immigration question, and basically every other question in the same vein, by essentially saying they'll keep eating and making others eat even after somebody dies.
Regulations are poisonous. You shouldn't eat any amount of poison, even if you think you have it figured out to not die. Particularly in this extended metaphor of society, because society works more slowly than the body does. You can poison society to death way before the obvious symptoms arise visibly.
There, I've ruined the joke. Make sense now?
A prohibition on murder is a regulation. The composition of currency is a regulation. You're just full retard