I posted a comment about this, but I think it's worthy of a post. I will summarize very briefly.
In 1973, David Rosenhan, a psychologist, published a study of mental institutions that basically went viral. In "On Being Sane in Insane Places" Rosenhan claimed to have sent 12 average people to voluntarily be assessed by different mental institutions. He catalogued the diagnoses they received and how long they spent institutionalized. This study was shocking in purporting to show how poorly diagnoses work and in exposing flaws in treatment. His claims, followed in 1975 by the famous movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest essentially killed off institutionalization in the United States and around the world. Those who supported chemically treatments, as opposed to psychotherapy and hospitalization, won a resounding victory, and that's the world we live in today.
The only problem is, Rosenhan's paper was a complete work of fiction, and he lied repeatedly about the experiment, about the results of the experiment, even about the people in the experiment. Rosenhan, himself was one of the participants, and the alleged experimental protocols that participants were supposed to follow simply did not exist. When experiences didn't match what he was looking for, he simply dismissed and ignored them, and made up 'alternative facts' instead.
Investigative reporter Susannah Calahan and history of psychiatry professor Andrew Scull have thoroughly destroyed Rosenhan's paper and results, and yet it is still the most formative and influential piece of work in the field in at least the last 75 years.
Andrew Scull's lengthy article. I highly recommend reading it all:
https://gwern.net/doc/psychiatry/schizophrenia/rosenhan/2023-scull.pdf
Archive: https://archive.is/fqt8z
This needs to be more widely known. Along with the perverted Kinsey (enough said) and the fraudster Ancel Keys, of the Minnesota Starvation Experiment, whose work lead directly to the false belief that "all fat is bad" and who is personally responsible for the high-carb low-fat diet trends of the 1960s on that have killed hundreds of millions, it shows the power that corrupt, fraudulent, and narrative-driven activist scientists can have on reshaping society around us.
No, we should NOT "trust the science," and to say otherwise is distinctly anti-scientific.
No. It doesn't work in a vaccum because you say so, so that you can feel good online. Taken as a whole, you're part of the problem.
Even being warned still making manosphere comments exactly like the Islamic state.
Clearly didn't bother looking at a single citation. Go waste someone elses time. You can't ruin my day, you're already ruined. I don't waste timed oboist causes anymore.
Maybe if feminists hadn't abused these men (and society in general) to the point that these weird AGPs have become "accepted," normal women wouldn't have to deal with them.
Chickens coming home to roost and all.
You aren't wrong about everything, but you're still a feminist bigot.
Why would I waste time look at your citations when you've already shown yourself to be retarded? I read the first line and disregarded everything else as inane babble.
I've been an anti-feminist, misogynist for decades. You will have to do better than name calling and "you are just like baddie guys!" to make me flinch in my beliefs.
I will give you one thing, I was wrong about nothing further coming from this. You've given me a laugh and helped remind me that I've been right all along. RadFems still are completely worthless and TERFs can never be an ally, even if we both hate trannies.
No one cares if you flinch. TERF's are the only ones getting shit done Staying the you've been right all along, bragging about refusing to look at citations.
Got aware someone else time like you're a waste of air.
Getting shit done on the same RadFem agenda that got us into half these messes. Very impressive, very cool.
Also try to slow down and breathe before you type, you'll make less elementary school grammar mistakes that way.