The main reasons it needs to be scrapped is that it was written or heavily edited by one side of the political spectrum, ''jurisprudenced'' by pozzed or ''usefully-neutral'' judges, and only one side of the political spectrum is forced to follow the charter.
Bruce Pardy, Law Prof @ Queens U has spoken about the fact that the Courts have adopted a pozzed "living tree doctrine" interpretation from Day 1 from its enactment in the 80s.
He reviewed at some point one of the first cases to use the Charter: female retired cops complained they didn't get full RCMP pensions like the men did because the vast majority of the women only worked part time. The Courts awarded them full benefit payouts because: Women.
It was essentially the US Women's Soccer Team case about 35 years early.
The main reasons it needs to be scrapped is that it was written or heavily edited by one side of the political spectrum, ''jurisprudenced'' by pozzed or ''usefully-neutral'' judges, and only one side of the political spectrum is forced to follow the charter.
Bruce Pardy, Law Prof @ Queens U has spoken about the fact that the Courts have adopted a pozzed "living tree doctrine" interpretation from Day 1 from its enactment in the 80s.
He reviewed at some point one of the first cases to use the Charter: female retired cops complained they didn't get full RCMP pensions like the men did because the vast majority of the women only worked part time. The Courts awarded them full benefit payouts because: Women.
It was essentially the US Women's Soccer Team case about 35 years early.