This is why I always played a Nord
(i.redd.it)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (85)
sorted by:
Neither are a problem. Women are hardwired on the height preference for the most part. A lot of things are their own damn fault but that's not one of them.
The existence of "Haves" and "have nots" are only a problem if you subscribe to Marxism or any other anti reality worldview.
Your lot in life is your lot in life, that's just how it works. Especially with regards to genetics.
But then you complain about a global elite that controls the world, which is actually the case, a nation less global elite controls the world, the only reason they deem themselves the elite is because they are the richest and you're just a peasant for them. They even own your government by the balls through DEBT.
Is that anti-reality worldview? No.
Said "elites" aren't. They're a persistent demonic cult that infiltrates and destroys precisely because they can't govern effectively.
They're evil because they can't accept their lot, and rebel against the rules of God in search of unnatural gain.
There's no inconsistency in my point here.
They're not. They're hardwired for status. It just so happens that tall men stick out from a crowd which makes them more memorable. Notoriety is then confused with importance, therefore status, therefore attractiveness.
It works like advertising works.
It's not some ephemeral meaningless coincidence as that.
Height and strength are correlated. Manlets are looked down on by men for the same reason, that weakness is a negative survival trait. Thus shortness is indicative of an undesirable trait.
For men, to be particularly short is essentially a disability.
Good counterpoint.
I dunno about particularly short, but I think in certain environments, you survive more if you're squat. I think that's why everyone isn't 6 ft tall on average. There's a mating preference toward taller males, but there's a survivorship bias towards shorter ones. Maybe just cuz people shoot the tall ones first, IDK.
AFAIK larger people are less efficient, although I don't know exactly why.
WTF drugs are you on? White males who are not nutritionally deprived (aka they actually have red meat in their diet growing up) very much average 5'10'' today.
Anyone claiming that the average men are less than 5'10" are including non-whites and thus their opinion is invalid.
I always felt like (white) Texans were taller than average, but maybe that's just the boots.
5'9" is average. Half (roughly) of the population is taller than that. Saying that it's unrealistic for women to want an above-average man is like saying that it's unrealistic for men to want a B cup or better.
I would say it is reasonable for everyone to want more than average. I would not say it is realistic.
They're not using logic in your other examples either. Nor do they actually want what they claim, some of them are lying and some don't know how to express themselves, but either way actually taking things women say at face value is foolish.
They don't actually care about how much you make, although it helps. Most women care about the tingle and very little else. The women who don't, the ones who actually care solely about wealth are the predators.
Tall contributes to the tingle. And 5"9' isn't "tall", let's be honest. It's above or about average depending on your race. Is it tallER than most women, sure.