Isn't National Socialism at its core basically just genetics matter, a nation should congregate people of similar genetics, government should provide social services to people and profits from the labor of people living in the country should go toward the benefit of the country rather than just individuals and especially just individuals who use their profits to benefits communities outside of the nation's community?
At its core everyone should be National Socialist to some degree. The socialist tenants and big government can be argued but the reality of race and nationalist economic policies can't be denied unless they're being denied by bad actors.
The only people who should outright oppose National Socialism in all regards are international capitalists who don't share genetics with the people laboring away in a country to the benefit of the capitalist. Basically, the true colonials of modern times are the only people who should oppose National Socialism in all regards because National Socialism does indeed provide a counter to neo-colonial imperialism in its modern form aka globalism and neoliberalism.
It would actually make sense to me that a lot of National Socialists within a country like Iran would exist. There may in fact be a divide among racially Iranian people and non-Iranian Muslims. The Iranian government likely wants immigrants of any race as long as they are Muslim but this could be a huge problem to racially Iranians. Many racially Iranian National Socialists might not necessarily be Muslim either because they wouldn't see religion as the solidifying piece for their nations but rather genetics.
It makes sense to me that this stuff exists but leftists can't really write about it very well due to a lack of understanding.
I know, that's why I even added in a comment for you specifically because I hate socialism too so I know the feeling:
At its core everyone should be National Socialist to some degree. The socialist tenants and big government can be argued but the reality of race and nationalist economic policies can't be denied unless they're being denied by bad actors.
You're confusing propaganda for ideology. The few elements of it that you have identified positively are neither inherent to, or exclusive to, national socialism.
Nationalism or at least some nationalistic elements are part of any strong society. Nationalism is also not tied to either side of the political scale - actual american nationalists, not the wehraboo larping faggots, are right wing, while national socialists are leftists.
Nationalism or at least some nationalistic elements are part of any strong society. Nationalism is also not tied to either side of the political scale - actual American nationalists, not the wehraboo larping faggots, are right wing, while national socialists are leftists.
Which is why I don't understand this "we're against commies so we must be right-wing"... Or maybe I do, it's just indoctrination, even if you do it yourself. Leftists will always fight each-other. Nationalism is just a flavor, not a full doctrine, you can attach it to a lot of things.
If people want to be right wing, or maybe a little bit more, national-conservatism is a thing.
Another funny idea is that a Jew can 't be nat-soc... as if the German variant is the only one. There's plenty of people they despise, surely.
What about National Socialism in which they were race first, socialist and nationalist is propaganda vs. ideology? I mean, that seems pretty solidly what they were...
Isn't National Socialism at its core basically just genetics matter, a nation should congregate people of similar genetics, government should provide social services to people and profits from the labor of people living in the country should go toward the benefit of the country rather than just individuals and especially just individuals who use their profits to benefits communities outside of the nation's community?
At its core everyone should be National Socialist to some degree. The socialist tenants and big government can be argued but the reality of race and nationalist economic policies can't be denied unless they're being denied by bad actors.
The only people who should outright oppose National Socialism in all regards are international capitalists who don't share genetics with the people laboring away in a country to the benefit of the capitalist. Basically, the true colonials of modern times are the only people who should oppose National Socialism in all regards because National Socialism does indeed provide a counter to neo-colonial imperialism in its modern form aka globalism and neoliberalism.
It would actually make sense to me that a lot of National Socialists within a country like Iran would exist. There may in fact be a divide among racially Iranian people and non-Iranian Muslims. The Iranian government likely wants immigrants of any race as long as they are Muslim but this could be a huge problem to racially Iranians. Many racially Iranian National Socialists might not necessarily be Muslim either because they wouldn't see religion as the solidifying piece for their nations but rather genetics.
It makes sense to me that this stuff exists but leftists can't really write about it very well due to a lack of understanding.
I know, that's why I even added in a comment for you specifically because I hate socialism too so I know the feeling:
You're confusing propaganda for ideology. The few elements of it that you have identified positively are neither inherent to, or exclusive to, national socialism.
Nationalism or at least some nationalistic elements are part of any strong society. Nationalism is also not tied to either side of the political scale - actual american nationalists, not the wehraboo larping faggots, are right wing, while national socialists are leftists.
Which is why I don't understand this "we're against commies so we must be right-wing"... Or maybe I do, it's just indoctrination, even if you do it yourself. Leftists will always fight each-other. Nationalism is just a flavor, not a full doctrine, you can attach it to a lot of things.
If people want to be right wing, or maybe a little bit more, national-conservatism is a thing.
Another funny idea is that a Jew can 't be nat-soc... as if the German variant is the only one. There's plenty of people they despise, surely.
What about National Socialism in which they were race first, socialist and nationalist is propaganda vs. ideology? I mean, that seems pretty solidly what they were...
Username checks out