Yes. You post walls of text and people have learned that they aren't worth reading from previous experiences with reading through them. You then act surprised whenever someone mentions this.
Yes, I'm very bad at communicating with brick walls. I'm much better at communicating with people who are willing to listen.
Further more, why would I improve my communication by leaving out evidence? Since I know for a fact that faggots that will never listen to evidence or reason are going to ignore it, I'd rather just lay out the evidence in full, verbose as it is, to show everyone else how false the comment actually is.
Only Cato even responded to my points, and by giving me an uncited series of quotes by someone who sounds like a Hitler apologist, who even took Rudolf Hess seriously (which neither German nor British sources ever did, even from the time).
Not one fucking soul dealt with reality.
And yet, I'm supposed to change my tune for people who respond to criticism with "foreskin muncher"; and you've got nothing to say about communication like that. Try tone policing the other direction, and let's see how long it takes you to be called a dirty fucking kike that deserves to be killed.
What does that have to do with his comment? Are you talking about being verbose?
Yes. You post walls of text and people have learned that they aren't worth reading from previous experiences with reading through them. You then act surprised whenever someone mentions this.
Most of those people aren't going to read it simply because I disagreed with their assertion that jew man bad.
The amount of words simply doesn't matter.
I thought about typing up a more constructive response but I'd rather keep it concise:
You are very bad at communicating.
Communicating with whom?
Yes, I'm very bad at communicating with brick walls. I'm much better at communicating with people who are willing to listen.
Further more, why would I improve my communication by leaving out evidence? Since I know for a fact that faggots that will never listen to evidence or reason are going to ignore it, I'd rather just lay out the evidence in full, verbose as it is, to show everyone else how false the comment actually is.
Only Cato even responded to my points, and by giving me an uncited series of quotes by someone who sounds like a Hitler apologist, who even took Rudolf Hess seriously (which neither German nor British sources ever did, even from the time).
Not one fucking soul dealt with reality.
And yet, I'm supposed to change my tune for people who respond to criticism with "foreskin muncher"; and you've got nothing to say about communication like that. Try tone policing the other direction, and let's see how long it takes you to be called a dirty fucking kike that deserves to be killed.