Vice President Kamala Harris is planning to show up for the previously agreed-upon debate set for September 10 on ABC – even if Donald Trump does not
Reuters: https://archive.ph/GPWlJ
the debate he already agreed to
The vice president will be there one way or the other to take the opportunity to speak to a prime time national audience
Image being so fucking treacherous that you play taksie-backsies with the presidential candidate elected by your party just a few months before the election because he turned out to be incredibly unpopular, only to turn around and claim that the opponent isn't showing up to an agreed-on debate when he clearly didn't agree to it.
For that matter, if ABC gives Kamala airtime alone it should be treated as the campaign contribution that it is.
They're going super hard on that narrative, I noticed.
If you search Kamala debate, it's all about Trump dodging, and being weak and/or cowardly. And even when it's Kamala dodging, they still manage to make it look like it's Trump's fault.
It's funny how they're, as always, painting Fox as 'far right' and all that, when Trump went and debated Biden on CNN. They've had past debates on Fox, too...why won't Kamala debate Trump? That's the real question, although the media, being friendly to her, will never ask that.
More cringe:
Newsweek: Donald Trump's Rules for Kamala Harris Debate Spark Mockery: 'Terrified'
The Guardian: Trump agrees to debate on Fox News – but Harris insists on ABC
Then you should have stuck with the original candidate...the one the Democrats voted for.
You. Literally. Switched. Out. Your. Candidate.
That's the "switch-up."
They will absolutely use the racism/sexism card when he does though and try to paint him as a monster who bullies the power wittle wimmenz.
This of course will never make them realize how bad it makes a leader look to have to cry bully like that, as long as they can get people emotionally against Trump.
And in turn enrage his own base for him going soft and letting her off the hook for all her failures and the bullshit around her candidacy.
Because calling her out for anything will be considered bullying, so its either give her nothing or give it his all.
Ah, but see, CNN is moderate and Fox News is far right by comparison. So Trump met Biden on a neutral platform, and now he’s demanding Kamala meet him in a space that’s biased against her.
That’s how the lefties see it, anyway. And they will declare it over and over, because it’s important everyone else see it that way too.
you have no fucking idea how rage inducing it is to be european and not retarded.
to listen to the cattle (yes, the jews are right about that one) repeat their hollow programming: "fox news is hitler, so is trump" "in europe the democrats would be far-right honhonhon"
there is no political solution.
Trump has an ongoing litigation against CBS or whoever they initially suggested and agreeing to appear there would have provided a conflict of interest they could have used against him. Of course he wouldn't accept their initial challenge and they knew that it would be a win/win for them; either he fucks up his lawsuit or they start whining about it to make him look bad.
It was ABC, but yeah. Trying to force him to do business with someone he's in a legal battle with is hilariously slimy.
To be clear for anyone who might not understand, Trump agreed to debate Biden, not her.
Because it's the ONLY thing they can try to do a 'gotcha' on. Notice how she ducked the Black correspondents convention went she was meant to be there, Trump went and the Media tried HARD to frame it as Trump failed when he had and audience of Black people laughing with him saying that Kamala only RECENTLY became Black when she's been Indian all her life.
You know the black journalists thing was great for him because they spent about 5 minutes telling you how it went and then moved on to new dialogue loops. If it hadn't been an incredible success for him, they'd still be replaying clips.
When she becomes the official Dem candidate, which still hasn't happened, he'll agree to a debate with all the terms ironed out beforehand. Then their narrative will be that HD "caved" or "U -Turned" and "reluctantly agreed."
They'll keep covering for her after he crushes her in that debate, too.
He's already made a full proposal, I believe. September 4th, on Fox. She seems to be hesitant.
And the media hasn't U-turned yet, the claim is still that he's refusing to debate her.
He did, and she refused. Likely because this one is a trap and she needs that much "prep time" to be remotely ready to take him on after being a literal background character for years and society looking down on sucking dick on stage.
Its basically both of them trying to set up the debate to be most beneficial for them, but while Trump's proposal makes him look stronger and more capable (being earlier, being with backstabbers like Fox), hers makes her look scrambling.
This is such an open goal for Trump:
Probably won't use this because of something cuckish about lowering the temperature.
Saying you don't trust the security sounds weak; going back to Butler PA is a power move.
Trump will use being shot where it's most effective, in Pennsylvania. When he goes back there the assassination attempt will be all over the local news, but if he's saying 'oh no I was shot poor me' all the time it will turn whiny.
It's PR, it's not about actual risk assessment or being honest. Anyway, Butler PA is probably one of the safest places in the country for him atm.
He can go where he wants, but the point is that whenever Kamala suggests he goes anywhere, he should respond 'oh look she's trying to kill me.'
They watched him get shot and immediately stand back up less than a month ago on live TV and their response is to sneer and call him a pussy who needs a safe space (it's good to mock the concept of safe spaces now) for trying to arrange a debate with them. There's no reconciling with people this warped.
They'd only let Kamala do a Fox News debate if some faggot like Chris Wallace does her job for her by constantly interrupting Trump, giving him gotcha/distraction questions instead of policy questions, etc.