If search was better, I could go find it, but I can't be bothered.
Regardless, you did say it, and you stood by it at the time.
You laughed at girls - not women - girls being mutilated, just because they're female.
I've said it before; I don't dislike you. I even think you're on point on some of your observations...although I always find your conclusions extremely off point. Regardless, I don't dislike you. But I remember that particular statement of yours because it was so fucking monstrous.
You said you wanted little girls to suffer, and you stood by it when called out. One of your worst moments. 'They were getting what they deserve, because they would have grown up to hate men,' or something to that effect, to paraphrase.
Yup. He gaslights on the trans stuff hard. It is funny, since he knows it hurts women and girls, but thinks it helps men get a leg up in the sexual race. It's pretty absurd. It's all about sticking it to women and, for whatever reason, he thinks trannyism is a means toward that end.
It's possible, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. He does legitimately hate women. He thinks the trans stuff can be used to harm women, and "help" men...sort of. It could be that simple, although I agree he has no love for white people, and continually tries to minimize that narrative and focus solely on how bad men have it.
It really doesn't help the argument when you use mastectomies as an example of an irreversible surgery.
Again, I'll see if I can find the specific one I'm talking about but, based on a cursory search, I'm correct in how I characterized your feelings on the matter.
You've said as much.
If search was better, I could go find it, but I can't be bothered.
Regardless, you did say it, and you stood by it at the time.
You laughed at girls - not women - girls being mutilated, just because they're female.
I've said it before; I don't dislike you. I even think you're on point on some of your observations...although I always find your conclusions extremely off point. Regardless, I don't dislike you. But I remember that particular statement of yours because it was so fucking monstrous.
You said you wanted little girls to suffer, and you stood by it when called out. One of your worst moments. 'They were getting what they deserve, because they would have grown up to hate men,' or something to that effect, to paraphrase.
He also acts like everything is reversible. "If they regret it they can just get fake boobs."
Yup. He gaslights on the trans stuff hard. It is funny, since he knows it hurts women and girls, but thinks it helps men get a leg up in the sexual race. It's pretty absurd. It's all about sticking it to women and, for whatever reason, he thinks trannyism is a means toward that end.
He's just promoting it because it's destructive to White society.
It's possible, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. He does legitimately hate women. He thinks the trans stuff can be used to harm women, and "help" men...sort of. It could be that simple, although I agree he has no love for white people, and continually tries to minimize that narrative and focus solely on how bad men have it.
Ask him about the irreversible voice pitch drop that can happen, that will be a fun one to see him try and figure out.
Ya we are all sick of imp1 pretending to not know what we are talking about. Nah I'm done wasting my time going back to prove what he said to himself.
Well, shit, now I'll have to dig it up, thanks.
You got me, I'm a female.
Watch, you'll take that literally, despite it being an obvious joke, and now suspect me of being One of Them.
Anyway, I'll try to find the exact one I'm thinking off, but even a brief search finds a lot that at least correlates with what I'm talking about:
Walter Duranty-New York Times does a mostly puff piece on child mutilation (featuring "Dr." Yeet the Teet)
Tennessee has just banned the surgical mutilation of children
Again, I'll see if I can find the specific one I'm talking about but, based on a cursory search, I'm correct in how I characterized your feelings on the matter.