This is like UFO footage. I don't see anything except the logo. More importantly I don't understand this second shooter theory. Why would there have to be a second shooter? What is unconvincing about a single shooter?
It doesn't need to be more convincing, it needs to implicate the Deep State further and not be completely incredible. The theory is that Ree Tardy Oswald was a patsy who was supposed to start firing and then someone else was supposed to take the shot that actually killed Trump. Absent something clearer than the ~6 pixels that's supposed to be a person up there (that isn't part of Trump's security team, which I would find more likely, given that's the highest point in the area as far as I can tell) I don't see any reason to speculate about a second shooter.
Firstly, I get what you're saying, I get your position, and I'm not attacking you, I'm agreeing.
It doesn't need to be more convincing
It needs to be not retarded, though.
...it needs to implicate the Deep State further and not be completely incredible.
This fails, and makes people look retarded.
I do think there very well might have been a second shooter, and I've been called ridiculous for that belief...this does nothing toward advancing that position.
The theory is that Ree Tardy Oswald was a patsy who was supposed to start firing and then someone else was supposed to take the shot that actually killed Trump.
This footage does nothing to advance that either. Again, that's something I also believe to be a very strong possibility, but this does nothing to advance that.
As an Unhinged Conspiracy Theorist...this footage is fucking embarrassing. Fuck off with this bullshit, whoever is pushing this.
Yeah, this footage is retarded. The idea isn't retarded on it's face, but so far there isn't anything I've seen to make that more credible than the idea that there was just a single shooter.
Remember that the term "Conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA to discredit people who were revealing actual government conspiracies. The idea that they would go a step further and put forward retarded theories to discredit people talking about legitimate conspiracies isn't far fetched, but since social media has suddenly given every retard a reach of millions to billions of people, they probably don't even have to do that.
so far there isn't anything I've seen to make that more credible than the idea that there was just a single shooter.
I'll give you my take, if you're interested (or if you're not!): I find it absurd, the official story that this untrained retard managed to make that shot, when you add the official story that a police officer just reached the roof and Crooks aimed his rifle at him. It's one thing to nearly make a headshot at 130 yards, it's a completely different story to do it after your life is just officially over, your cover blown, your timeframe is reduced to practically zero, you're like 100% adrenaline, and you took your scope off your target.
That's what got me first seriously thinking there may have been a second shooter. That's an absurd shot for a seeming novice, if that is indeed what happened. Not buying that story.
Remember that the term "Conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA to discredit people...
Yeah, I'm never forgetting that, I'm well aware. Fucking spooks.
I'm just glad they don't operate on American soil!
This is like UFO footage. I don't see anything except the logo. More importantly I don't understand this second shooter theory. Why would there have to be a second shooter? What is unconvincing about a single shooter?
It doesn't need to be more convincing, it needs to implicate the Deep State further and not be completely incredible. The theory is that Ree Tardy Oswald was a patsy who was supposed to start firing and then someone else was supposed to take the shot that actually killed Trump. Absent something clearer than the ~6 pixels that's supposed to be a person up there (that isn't part of Trump's security team, which I would find more likely, given that's the highest point in the area as far as I can tell) I don't see any reason to speculate about a second shooter.
Firstly, I get what you're saying, I get your position, and I'm not attacking you, I'm agreeing.
It needs to be not retarded, though.
This fails, and makes people look retarded.
I do think there very well might have been a second shooter, and I've been called ridiculous for that belief...this does nothing toward advancing that position.
This footage does nothing to advance that either. Again, that's something I also believe to be a very strong possibility, but this does nothing to advance that.
As an Unhinged Conspiracy Theorist...this footage is fucking embarrassing. Fuck off with this bullshit, whoever is pushing this.
Yeah, this footage is retarded. The idea isn't retarded on it's face, but so far there isn't anything I've seen to make that more credible than the idea that there was just a single shooter.
Remember that the term "Conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA to discredit people who were revealing actual government conspiracies. The idea that they would go a step further and put forward retarded theories to discredit people talking about legitimate conspiracies isn't far fetched, but since social media has suddenly given every retard a reach of millions to billions of people, they probably don't even have to do that.
I'll give you my take, if you're interested (or if you're not!): I find it absurd, the official story that this untrained retard managed to make that shot, when you add the official story that a police officer just reached the roof and Crooks aimed his rifle at him. It's one thing to nearly make a headshot at 130 yards, it's a completely different story to do it after your life is just officially over, your cover blown, your timeframe is reduced to practically zero, you're like 100% adrenaline, and you took your scope off your target.
That's what got me first seriously thinking there may have been a second shooter. That's an absurd shot for a seeming novice, if that is indeed what happened. Not buying that story.
Yeah, I'm never forgetting that, I'm well aware. Fucking spooks.
I'm just glad they don't operate on American soil!