Was it planned by the Republicans that like Trump to drum up support for Trump?
Was it planned by the Republicans that hate Trump in order to get rid of him and instate their own puppet candidate?
Was it planned by the Democrats to eliminate their biggest political threat?
Or was it planned by the Democrats not only to eliminate Trump, but so they could then have another "crazy MAGA" guy go and shoot Biden in revenge so they could put him out to pasture and instate Harris as the new President and suspend the election?
Also, was it planned for him to survive from the beginning, or did they actually intend to kill him?
It was a magic bullet. Set to go directly for Trump's ear. DUH!!
What’s dumber, thinking he was missed on purpose, or thinking that mUh dEeP sTaTE was foiled by diversity hiring when they could have guaranteed a kill in a million other ways, as we’ve seen them do many times in the past?
You've seen it when it succeeded. Confirmation bias, although pretty understandable in this case. They probably fail more often than they succeed, and then eventually get it right. There are so many storied of their victims living through tons of assassination attempts before they get got, if they get got. If this is 'let retarded lone wolf do the dirty work' again, this is what happens when you work with amateurs.
Plenty of CIA targets dodge their attempts long enough to legitimately die of old age.
Fidel Castro was famous for surviving multiple assassination attempts.
Yup, perfect example. If the CIA was as ultra-competent as they want to portray themselves, Castro would have died much earlier.
Thinking he was intentionally hit with a grazing shot on his head is infinitely dumber than a diversity hire fucking up. It's not even a close contest.
Ok so the people who secretly run the world and can plan assassinations through infiltrating the secret service to fill it with retarded diversity hires who fail at their only job ALSO uses diversity hires to pull their triggers…and fail at their only job…
And that’s not retarded?
Taking any mainstream narrative at face value is a mistake
It's not retarded, it's a strawman. You're saying it's a plan to boost Trump because the only other thing it could be is some deep state master plan that makes no sense.
What we have here is a flock of birds situation. It looks like they're all changing course and operating together as one, but really they're reacting locally with the same goals in mind.
The democrats in the SS, FBI, intel, local police all want Trump dead. They don't have to all work together in a plan, they just all half-ass their jobs. The SS puts the incompetent women on Trump, FBI doesn't investigate threats or try to infiltrate anti-Trump orgs, three letter agencies sit on intel, local police say "not my job" to people chanting "shooter on the roof!".
You think for all theses pieces to happen it has to be coordinated, but it's not. They just all want the same outcome and operate independently.
The question was which is more retarded.
Intentionally hitting a grazing shot on the head is more retarded. Shut the fuck up.
Please elaborate some of the million other ways they could have guaranteed a kill without making it obvious it was a deep state sponsored operation.
Do him like RFK or JFK (multiple gunmen with one a designated patsy and the rest acting as insurance), take out his plane, poison his food, kill him with any number of untraceable methods designed by the military industrial complex for covert assassination like heart attack guns or nerve agents.
I mean, the current narrative going around is that the head of the secret service was in on it and suppressing security at the event. If they can get to the head of his security detail, isn’t it atleast a little retarded to think they’d trust some estrogen enriched 20yo antifa goon to take the kill shot?
Look before you reply, moron.
What am I missing, jerkoff?
You're missing a third digit in your IQ score, fuckwit. Clearly you are one of those mentally handicapped people who can't process inner monologue, so you need the medium of dialogue to reach the simplest of conclusions. Otherwise you would have realized on your own that you replied to my comment, not Kienan's.