You will Own Nothing
(next.agl.com.au)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
People will fucking trash them.
I don't know if the kind of people that would trash them could afford them. I do hope so though.
They're electric cars, so I imagine a lot of takers will be entitled leftists with more money than sense. Being shitty people who leave others to clean up their messes because they feel doing so is beneath them is a trait they share with ghetto trash.
Humans with money trash shit, too.
ESPECIALLY "New Money".
It's like they went to the Joe Walsh school of trashing shit.
They'll trash shit because it's NOT THEIRS. Plain and simple.
Just saw this ad on TV for the first time in Australia. The cheapest available is a Peugeot e 2008 at AU$235 a week and there's 16 to choose from and the dearest is BMW iX2 at AU$530 a week. So if you take a mid range you're looking at $16,000 per year. You'd have to be fucking insane or a massive virtue signaller with more money than sense to take these offers up.
You could probably buy a used car outright for that kind of money.
I'm not taking inflation into account, but in 2018 I got used car for about that price and the insurance costs are reasonable. But double that price and you're still breaking even after 2 years.
Then they can become a freeman,soverign or take inspiration from what goes on in Bradford.
The only way that could even come close to break-even is if they were supplying the charging for the entire duration at no additional cost. They're not, they're trying to sell you chargers on top of it. What a joke.
Look at those happy trendy kids with no money or ability to move on.
Beach trip!
Wait until they make you pay for a one-off licence fee (that happens to be the cost of the car) and a monthly subscription fee on top of all the extra charges (microtransactions).
These fucking hypocrites enrage me.
"Back to the cobalt mine, Kunta! Australia needs more e-cars!"
BMW charging people to use their own seat warmers beat this to the punch.
I doubt that car subscription services are even financially viable, but they can def nickel and dime people through microtransactions to unlock all the features on cars they supposedly own. That's gonna be the more prevalent form of "owning nothing and being (un)happy," using the internet-of-things to restrict use of the things that you supposedly own in the first place.
I actually know people in RL who have tried to sincerely argue in favor of car-less cities. They own cars themselves, of course, but they also think we would all be better off relying completely on public transportation or whatever.
I'd love to live in a place where I could completely rely on public transportation that was as convenient and comfortable as my own vehicles.
Unfortunately, that place does not and will not ever exist unless I wanted to move to Japan or Korea.
I absolutely hate driving, due to putting up with obnoxious commutes for the past several years. But I also spent a good chunk of time unemployed and carless. I hated how restricting it was on my freedom. I got a lot of exercise, and it was a good experience for me overall, but I can't imagine going full time without a car.
Trains exist
Trams exist
Buses exist
Bikes exist
And lastly... Taxis exist
A civilized country is keen on that train and bike combo (see japan, see netherlands)
by civilized you mean mono-ethnic. people drive in "multi-cultural" societies and hate public transport because staying away from nogs, abos, pajeets, pakis, somalis, etc is absolutely worth the cost.
great examples with japan and netherlands, btw. proving my point
Is that how it is in your shithole? "women by the age of 18 are ''used up'?"
If you subhumans had the integrity to not rape children, maybe the women in your country wouldn't grow up with vaginal damages and veneral diseases. But now that you're forced to live with the consequences of your actions, you're infesting other countries to push your autogenocidal agenda.
Sucks to be you, though - you're on my hunting grounds now.